From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FDppm-0000gS-QN for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 21:23:11 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1RLM05P009753; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 21:22:00 GMT Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu (lennier.cc.vt.edu [198.82.162.213]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1RLI8C6024753 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 21:18:08 GMT Received: from zidane.cc.vt.edu (IDENT:mirapoint@evil-zidane.cc.vt.edu [10.1.1.13]) by lennier.cc.vt.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k1RLI6Qv022209 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:18:06 -0500 Received: from [128.173.184.73] (gs4073.geos.vt.edu [128.173.184.73]) by zidane.cc.vt.edu (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id FDO74965; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:18:06 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <44036C8D.8030209@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:18:05 -0500 From: "Stephen P. Becker" User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060206) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role References: <20060226222217.GB17257@aerie.halcy0n.com> <1140997703.12229.166.camel@demandred.gnqs.org> <20060227003413.GE17257@aerie.halcy0n.com> <20060227170834.075e9388@snowdrop.home> <1141071970.804.19.camel@demandred.gnqs.org> <20060227203709.2a7bff47@snowdrop.home> <20060227204530.GO1516@toucan.gentoo.org> <20060227205445.057a91d9@snowdrop.home> <44036974.9070200@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <44036974.9070200@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 0a265945-f863-45dd-a9ba-f3ca8542e8c8 X-Archives-Hash: f01e73d536926f1383865cb3e5f62f23 Grant Goodyear wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> My point is that that's a nasty QA bug that's relying upon input from >> Stuart to be fixed. Whilst that one's still alive, I'm not going to go >> around filing more similar "breaks non-interactively" bugs because the >> discussion will just get repeated over and over. > > Huh? I just read through the bug, and it actually appears to be > resolved pending Chris' testing w/ the needed USE flags added to the > various profiles. I'll admit that the fix is inelegant, but I'm missing > where it's waiting upon Stuart for additional info. Am I missing something? Yes, you are missing that the bug really isn't fixed. There are still USE combinations which would be otherwise perfectly valid, but which cause php to fail to emerge, thus reaking non-interactivity and forcing people to (ab)use /etc/portage/package.use to get things working properly. -Steve -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list