From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
	id 1FDoeq-00059A-Vn
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 20:07:49 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1RK75So008860;
	Mon, 27 Feb 2006 20:07:05 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1RK4w8u002697
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 20:04:59 GMT
Received: from c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net ([67.171.150.177] helo=[192.168.1.106])
	by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54)
	id 1FDoc6-0000AM-RI
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 20:04:58 +0000
Message-ID: <44035B76.70004@gentoo.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:05:10 -0800
From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@gentoo.org>
User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060208)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role
References: <20060226222217.GB17257@aerie.halcy0n.com>	<20060226231121.GB11930@dogmatix.willow.local>	<20060226232147.37349bc2@snowdrop.home>	<20060226233558.GD11930@dogmatix.willow.local>	<20060227000929.GC17257@aerie.halcy0n.com>	<440247DE.5010902@gentoo.org>	<20060227003541.GF17257@aerie.halcy0n.com>	<44025B90.3080208@gentoo.org> <20060227163530.687d6ae9@snowdrop.home>
In-Reply-To: <20060227163530.687d6ae9@snowdrop.home>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="------------enigA2498B96299FFB05F41A8102"
X-Archives-Salt: d638e99c-ab63-47a6-88de-89dc015421ea
X-Archives-Hash: cd4d032afe3db907a7e512902778744b

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigA2498B96299FFB05F41A8102
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 17:53:20 -0800 Donnie Berkholz
> <spyderous@gentoo.org> wrote:
> | The maintainer should be the absolute authority over his/her packages=
,
> | and only the council should be able to overrule maintainer decisions
> | in the case of disagreement between the maintainer and anybody else.
>=20
> So if the maintainer sticks SANDBOX_DISABLE=3D"1" rm -fr / in global sc=
ope
> and refuses to move it, QA will have to get council approval to fix it?=


I already addressed that in the next email in the thread.

"That assumes lack of extenuating circumstances such as
security vulnerabilities or major tree breakage."

Thanks,
Donnie


--------------enigA2498B96299FFB05F41A8102
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEA1t2XVaO67S1rtsRAvJ9AJ9HO9LLY2TYhSIqf2sJVBW4cVYC0ACdFeez
0C7tNHUf+kHS1kp3OVbjXn0=
=fKXV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enigA2498B96299FFB05F41A8102--
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list