From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FDldz-0000Ha-PD for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:54:44 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1RGr9eI029524; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:53:09 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1RGlxjq016820 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:47:59 GMT Received: from align.cns.ksu.edu ([129.130.0.165]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1FDlXS-0002Sr-Rj for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:47:58 +0000 Message-ID: <44032D3E.5020500@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:47:58 -0600 From: Lance Albertson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Macintosh/20051201) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role References: <20060226222217.GB17257@aerie.halcy0n.com> <20060226231121.GB11930@dogmatix.willow.local> <20060226232147.37349bc2@snowdrop.home> <20060226233558.GD11930@dogmatix.willow.local> <20060227000929.GC17257@aerie.halcy0n.com> <440247DE.5010902@gentoo.org> <20060227003541.GF17257@aerie.halcy0n.com> <44025B90.3080208@gentoo.org> <20060227163530.687d6ae9@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20060227163530.687d6ae9@snowdrop.home> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.2.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig363DDA9D176BF6BC58D4C4A4" X-Archives-Salt: 4cdd726d-8a2a-448e-82f6-cce16370745c X-Archives-Hash: 1e51f97da7a77a5e1d5517c4d4814a6c This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig363DDA9D176BF6BC58D4C4A4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 17:53:20 -0800 Donnie Berkholz > wrote: > | The maintainer should be the absolute authority over his/her packages= , > | and only the council should be able to overrule maintainer decisions > | in the case of disagreement between the maintainer and anybody else. >=20 > So if the maintainer sticks SANDBOX_DISABLE=3D"1" rm -fr / in global sc= ope > and refuses to move it, QA will have to get council approval to fix it?= Use some common sense when showing an example please. We all know that something that stupid needs to be delt with quickly. --=20 Lance Albertson Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager --- GPG Public Key: Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net --------------enig363DDA9D176BF6BC58D4C4A4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFEAy0+QW+hXSf0t0IRAj9wAKCev/bHn0PMcuDEqHZ9vwJk1OySSgCgnpSm J3gKjRJHeIEB7D7BlwsaJ5I= =FwUf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig363DDA9D176BF6BC58D4C4A4-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list