From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FDbrL-0000vb-FX for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 06:27:51 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1R6R70E006448; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 06:27:07 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1R6PJRT007137 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 06:25:19 GMT Received: from c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net ([67.171.150.177] helo=[192.168.1.106]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1FDbos-0003mX-U2 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 06:25:19 +0000 Message-ID: <44029B63.5090800@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 22:25:39 -0800 From: Donnie Berkholz User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060208) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role References: <20060226222217.GB17257@aerie.halcy0n.com> <20060226231121.GB11930@dogmatix.willow.local> <20060226232147.37349bc2@snowdrop.home> <20060226233558.GD11930@dogmatix.willow.local> <20060227000929.GC17257@aerie.halcy0n.com> <440247DE.5010902@gentoo.org> <20060227003541.GF17257@aerie.halcy0n.com> <44025B90.3080208@gentoo.org> <20060227021037.GH17257@aerie.halcy0n.com> <4402732A.6050707@gentoo.org> <1141017187.4846.27.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1141017187.4846.27.camel@localhost> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig224B7B66DA2B974E382DD2F3" X-Archives-Salt: f3aa2313-cf28-411a-abe1-91eef5685dba X-Archives-Hash: 0604204a49287dde62d11f0ca60c0818 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig224B7B66DA2B974E382DD2F3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ned Ludd wrote: > On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 19:34 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote: >> I'm looking at this as "innocent until proven guilty" versus "guilty >> until proven innocent." When parties are in disagreement, the _current= _ >> situation should stand until the council (or the two groups in questio= n) >> resolves it. That assumes lack of extenuating circumstances such as >> security vulnerabilities or major tree breakage. >=20 > The devs asked for a council. A council was elected. The council decide= d > that QA trumps devs. If anybody has a problem with that they are free t= o > object at the next council meeting. The council decided that QA trumps devs for documented policy. It didn't decide, at least from what I saw, that QA could just do whatever they feel like without any sort of change to the policy. Thanks, Donnie --------------enig224B7B66DA2B974E382DD2F3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEAptkXVaO67S1rtsRAp+PAJ0YWt+UBQhISPRS23IsE4+d0VhjFQCeJZDy biXC7XKUD16JelypRGiM+xU= =iL1D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig224B7B66DA2B974E382DD2F3-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list