public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Myers <fluffymikey@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] KDE, metapackages, and monolithic packages
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 02:32:21 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44001615.4030707@gmail.com> (raw)

Hello!

Currently, as you all surely already know, KDE is currently handled with 
metapackages or monolithic packages.  The metapackages is very 
convenient for a more complete install of KDE, and the monolithic 
packages are better or a more modular install.  However, with the 
metapackages, it seems much more difficult than necessary to rebuild the 
KDE packages.  Like, say I wanted to add a user flag to support 
something I just added, like xinerama support.  With metapackages the 
way they are now, I would have to completely uninstall every single 
package and then reemerge the metapackage and it's dependencies.  Just 
simply reemerging the metapackage doesn't actually recompile anything.  
Also, if I wanted to add support for part of KDE, like say, alsa support 
for kdemultimedia, I would have to manually unemerge each individual 
package related to kdemultimedia and then reemerge the metapackage.

My question is;  Is there any better way to do these kinds of things 
yet?  If not, are there any plans for making this kind of process any 
easier for the users?  I really like KDE and I'm sure there are a lot of 
other people that do as well.  I can understand the reason for going to 
metapackages, but it doesn't seem to have been as smooth of a process as 
intended.  At least not in some aspects.  I am not a developer, and I 
apologize if this has already been addressed.  I haven't seen anything 
related to this issue.  The KDE howto docs seem to assume the user is 
doing an initial install and it doesn't address if part of a metapackage 
is to be reinstalled.  It also suggests metapackages over monolithic 
packages.  I'm not really sure of the reason for such a suggestion if 
making a change to the USE flags is going to be so difficult.

Maybe somebody can clear this up for me?  Again, I apologize if this has 
already been addressed.

Thanks,
Mike

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



             reply	other threads:[~2006-02-25  9:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-25  8:32 Mike Myers [this message]
2006-02-25  9:06 ` [gentoo-dev] KDE, metapackages, and monolithic packages Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2006-02-25 18:33   ` Mike Myers
2006-02-25 18:44     ` Sebastian Bergmann
2006-02-25 18:45     ` John Myers
2006-02-25 20:07       ` Mike Myers
2006-02-25 20:15         ` Matthijs van der Vleuten
2006-02-26 10:52         ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2006-02-26 23:05           ` Mike Myers
2006-02-27  0:56             ` Richard Fish
2006-02-27 10:09             ` Paul de Vrieze
2006-02-28  0:13             ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2006-02-25  9:06 ` [gentoo-dev] " Petteri Räty

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44001615.4030707@gmail.com \
    --to=fluffymikey@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox