From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1F7ddH-00058N-3j for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 19:08:39 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k1AJ7Ue6024116; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 19:07:30 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1AJ5W1J012981 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 19:05:32 GMT Received: from c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net ([67.171.150.177] helo=[192.168.1.106]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1F7daF-0005ET-P0 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 19:05:31 +0000 Message-ID: <43ECE391.7050402@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 11:03:45 -0800 From: Donnie Berkholz User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060208) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-nds/gq References: <46672052.20060210103352@gentoo.org> <1139579818.9108.6.camel@TesterBox.tester.ca> In-Reply-To: <1139579818.9108.6.camel@TesterBox.tester.ca> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig275E9B057EB31D83871F5E2D" X-Archives-Salt: c37523ef-51de-43cc-9d64-beb4ff4ac06b X-Archives-Hash: 85055928df6353206c89421921f6e4e7 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig275E9B057EB31D83871F5E2D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Olivier Cr=EAte wrote: > On Fri, 2006-10-02 at 10:33 +0100, Jakub Moc wrote: >> Otherwise, I suggest to p.mask this in two weeks and then remove from >> portage. >=20 > Is there any other useful gtk ldap browser in the tree ? There's a bug for LAT -- http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D86854 -= - but the current assignee apparently doesn't want it. Thanks, Donnie --------------enig275E9B057EB31D83871F5E2D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD7OOSXVaO67S1rtsRAi36AKC2gosjS52p9/tlKpU2Q+lPX07UswCfQpUX KDuLPoJhnOolIt6Imzw2ZmY= =Hmuv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig275E9B057EB31D83871F5E2D-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list