From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1F2v1T-0006Ai-NT for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2006 18:42:08 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k0SIfPoD032379; Sat, 28 Jan 2006 18:41:25 GMT Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu (lennier.cc.vt.edu [198.82.162.213]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k0SIdZjH013671 for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2006 18:39:36 GMT Received: from dagger.cc.vt.edu (IDENT:mirapoint@evil-dagger.cc.vt.edu [10.1.1.11]) by lennier.cc.vt.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k0SIdYg3018801 for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2006 13:39:34 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.2] (blacksburg-bsr1-69-170-32-128.chvlva.adelphia.net [69.170.32.128]) by dagger.cc.vt.edu (MOS 3.6.4-CR) with ESMTP id FCQ68965 (AUTH spbecker); Sat, 28 Jan 2006 13:39:30 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43DBBA5F.1060906@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 13:39:27 -0500 From: "Stephen P. Becker" User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060118) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: bootstrapping since gcc 3.4 is stable References: <200601271540.43987.pauldv@gentoo.org> <200601271534.k0RFY8kX022502@gw.open-hosting.net> <200601281556.20642.pauldv@gentoo.org> <200601281806.k0SI6kN9005468@gw.open-hosting.net> In-Reply-To: <200601281806.k0SI6kN9005468@gw.open-hosting.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 84f1c945-53d5-41dc-8edc-1a524fd88a5d X-Archives-Hash: 5fc779cc36e53675b77acde50673efa7 MIkey wrote: > Paul de Vrieze wrote: > >> Using this flags on a freshly compiled stage3 (from a stage1, just running >> emerge system without setting useflags) I get no blockers at all, when >> setting the useflags at the point that system has been recompiled. >> >> Depclean does suggest removing a number of packages though. Some of which >> can be dangerous to remove (like pam). >> >> I'm sorry, but I can't replicate the problem with regard to merging php >> for these useflags on a fresh stage3. > > On second thought, never mind :) I am not sure what you are trying to point > out here in the first place. > He is trying (quite successfully) to show that you are full of shit. -Steve -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list