From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1F2Bfs-0007PL-9J for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 18:16:48 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k0QIG35G009971; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 18:16:03 GMT Received: from www.suchdol.net (www.suchdol.net [82.208.33.2]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k0QIDnMP028621 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 18:13:49 GMT Received: from [10.18.6.61] (slon.basa.dejvice.czf [10.18.6.61]) by www.suchdol.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8918C3034 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:13:48 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43D91158.2040608@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:13:44 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan_Kundr=E1t?= Organization: Gentoo Linux User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051214) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: bootstrapping since gcc 3.4 is stable References: <1138284761.10589.54.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <200601260940.15770.mikey@badpenguins.com> <43D8FA31.2030300@gentoo.org> <200601261718.k0QHHup1012542@gw.open-hosting.net> <43D9097E.7010001@gentoo.org> <200601261754.k0QHsleA012883@gw.open-hosting.net> In-Reply-To: <200601261754.k0QHsleA012883@gw.open-hosting.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigEE66419980956C9E88816ED1" X-Archives-Salt: 2146629e-f3e7-4aac-828f-645c741ba8c3 X-Archives-Hash: 57732f97ffb6ff003701422b50d607e1 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigEE66419980956C9E88816ED1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIkey wrote: > A bug, again, that the stage1 installation method was immune to, How come? (I'm not familiar with toolchain.eclass at all.) > which is > the topic at hand. Not who reported what when. I found that bug when it > hit me and noticed that it had been reported. I thanked the Gods that you > were working on it, that I hadn't attempted to upgrade a production box, > and went about my business avoiding it by installing from stage1. Aaaargh. You've mentioned "bug reports [...] on upgrading gcc via that method". Got anything apropriate? -jkt -- cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth --------------enigEE66419980956C9E88816ED1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD2RFZamXfqERyJRcRAkHUAJ9uP7xx4ak18NH2wfMLm7fq6CTYpACeMESU u/AH4wyZOXhRN9eJzfF8Y/c= =LRGi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigEE66419980956C9E88816ED1-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list