From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
	id 1F1gK5-0001hm-1i
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 08:48:13 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k0P8kedd022043;
	Wed, 25 Jan 2006 08:46:40 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k0P8hF08016392
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 08:43:15 GMT
Received: from c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net ([67.171.150.177] helo=[192.168.1.106])
	by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54)
	id 1F1gFH-0003MN-8I
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 08:43:15 +0000
Message-ID: <43D73A20.7060409@gentoo.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 00:43:12 -0800
From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@gentoo.org>
User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060120)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Unmasking modular X
References: <43D5D1E4.9020801@gentoo.org> <20060125072421.7b0b2693@snowdrop.home> <43D72B69.6000207@gentoo.org> <200601251712.13755.jstubbs@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <200601251712.13755.jstubbs@gentoo.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="------------enig3E799D1FA560D44EA0FAF7AA"
X-Archives-Salt: a4e6a9f1-5055-467c-b0ed-21e096c674e1
X-Archives-Hash: 23fa4e5e96ea8de669567d481897e3ea

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig3E799D1FA560D44EA0FAF7AA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Jason Stubbs wrote:
> I'm not exactly sure what you mean by "broken" in the first paragraph n=
or how=20
> a check can help with unmaintained (=3Dno commits, no?) packages, but i=
f a=20
> repoman check will hasten package porting while smoothing the users' ri=
de,=20
> I'm personally all for it.

By "broken" I mean unported. In other words, directly depending on
either virtual/x11 or x11-base/xorg-x11. The check will help discover
unmaintained packages by not allowing people to do flyby fixes without
also fixing this.

What can I do to speed up the process of getting this into a 2.1
release? Keep in mind my python is beyond bad.

Thanks,
Donnie


--------------enig3E799D1FA560D44EA0FAF7AA
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFD1zoiXVaO67S1rtsRAhWuAKDpuqdhGI4cIZs3kRiZBqhokicy6wCgnDlz
bjlpnCjpMre0FjhJVIUaasM=
=sgI7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig3E799D1FA560D44EA0FAF7AA--
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list