From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1F1Wy3-0005wl-OJ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 22:48:52 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k0OMm5Ng012632; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 22:48:05 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k0OMjXvE008138 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 22:45:33 GMT Received: from c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net ([67.171.150.177] helo=[192.168.1.106]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1F1Wur-0005ml-83 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 22:45:33 +0000 Message-ID: <43D6AE0C.3080702@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:45:32 -0800 From: Donnie Berkholz User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060120) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Unmasking modular X References: <43D5D1E4.9020801@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <43D5D1E4.9020801@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF85FB2DEE8CF2FFCDA55C02B" X-Archives-Salt: 8426b0a8-2d9b-4c0f-bbaf-f293ecb031bd X-Archives-Hash: db1032e2de9375d057da77f5073fbf97 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF85FB2DEE8CF2FFCDA55C02B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Donnie Berkholz wrote: > So here's my plan: Before modular X enters ~arch, I will ensure that al= l > porting bugs blocking #112675 are closed. As new bugs are filed, I will= > ensure that they are closed within 2 days, giving their maintainers tha= t > long to respond and close it themselves. After 2 days, I, or other > members of the x11 team and any volunteers, will jump in and fix it > ourselves. I've thought a bit about this, and it just doesn't make sense to wait two days. There's no real good reasons why we shouldn't just fix things right away, and it'll probably make a lot of people concerned about ongoing tree breakage happier. Thanks, Donnie --------------enigF85FB2DEE8CF2FFCDA55C02B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD1q4MXVaO67S1rtsRAhvoAJ4kvClv3ikIdr4qNM2KY125mEWa+gCdFh4C va2Nou7/v5SErPr052+VoZo= =P82m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF85FB2DEE8CF2FFCDA55C02B-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list