From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EveMI-0007UA-7M for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:29:34 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k08HSo3D002611; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:28:50 GMT Received: from centrmmtao05.cox.net (centrmmtao05.cox.net [70.168.83.79]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k08HQaVP016070 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:26:37 GMT Received: from [10.3.1.3] (really [68.102.201.166]) by centrmmtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060108172453.VRMA5868.centrmmtao05.cox.net@[10.3.1.3]> for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 12:24:53 -0500 Message-ID: <43C14B4B.7070603@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 11:26:35 -0600 From: Lance Albertson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051225) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 19: Gentoo Stable Portage Tree -- ideas References: <43BDF53C.8080205@leetworks.com> <20060106053556.GD28075@nightcrawler.e-centre.net> <623652d50601060100w2bd03634i@mail.gmail.com> <1136559950.18383.11.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20060106173901.GF28075@nightcrawler.e-centre.net> <1136575828.18383.81.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <43BEFE0D.5080604@gentoo.org> <1136729665.30850.5.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> <43C14416.9050106@gentoo.org> <20060108171915.GB16494@nightcrawler.e-centre.net> In-Reply-To: <20060108171915.GB16494@nightcrawler.e-centre.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigC8AA089F2DDB50DED25AB93A" X-Archives-Salt: 70e6dd27-b11e-45c7-8c4e-5f44c8789a1b X-Archives-Hash: 9bbd8a0c8ee9e9dd28c89096a35ffd4f This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigC8AA089F2DDB50DED25AB93A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Brian Harring wrote: > On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 10:55:50AM -0600, Lance Albertson wrote: > >>A few rough ideas that just popped in my >>head is either packing all of these versions into one tarball (not even >>sure if thats feasible) >>, or creating a hashed suffix based upon the >>useflags enabled/disabled at the time that you append to the tarball name. > > +1 on mangling the name. Need something for keywords anyways. > > Alternative is expanding the bintree format, cat/pkg-ver being a > directory, with the binpkgs held with in... > > Either way, bintree/binpkg format are all rolled into one mess, as > stated, open to proposals to make it less sucky. Is there an alternative format outside of bzip2tarballs that might fit this better? Ignoring backward compatibility, is there anything? -- Lance Albertson Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager --- GPG Public Key: Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net --------------enigC8AA089F2DDB50DED25AB93A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDwUtLQW+hXSf0t0IRAkReAJ9jEdTwoz5bsREa63eZYeDguUPaNgCg6PTb MWy0rdOJjrQLOc1gtK30TLI= =Taex -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigC8AA089F2DDB50DED25AB93A-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list