From: Kalin KOZHUHAROV <kalin@thinrope.net>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 20 /srv - Services Home Directory Support
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:26:50 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43C12F3A.4030408@thinrope.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43BEE892.6070504@gentoo.org>
Luca Barbato wrote:
> I'm thinking about adding the srvdir[1] global useflag.
>
> Scream if I miss some discussion preventing it.
>
> (fenice[2] will use it, that's why I'm adding it)
>
> lu
>
> [1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0020.html#implementation
> [2] http://packages.gentoo.org/search/?sstring=fenice
>
Hi all,
not a dev, but please bear with me :-)
>From [1] above:
GLEP: 20
Title: /srv - Services Home Directory Support
Version: 1.2
Last-Modified: 2004/11/11 21:35:53
Author: Stuart Herbert <stuart at gentoo.org>, Rob Holland <tigger at gentoo.org>
Status: Approved
Type: Standards Track
Content-Type: text/x-rst
Created: 09-Feb-2004
Post-History: 21-Feb-2004, 11-Nov-2004
It is 2006, any updates on this GELP?
Just a quick look turned out a 404 error on the FHS2.3 link. ( http://www.pathname.com/fhs/ ?)
I am not very read in LSB, but just saw there is a 3.x version...
What about LSB 3.x? Is it the same recomendation?
Although I run quite a bunch of services on a few boxes, I don't see this whole idea (/srv).
I read the GLEP, I read [FHS#srv] but still. And it says:
"The methodology used to name subdirectories of /srv is unspecified
as there is currently no consensus on how this should be done."
So how does Gentoo implement it?
[FHS#svg] http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#SRVDATAFORSERVICESPROVIDEDBYSYSTEM
And as the GLEP talks about webapps, what will an upgrade of a webapp (say Bugzilla) to/from srv?
I feel it breaking and user screaming.
And a few general comments:
Hmm, the GLEP index page [a] shows GLEP 20 with status "SA" which according to the legend is
"Standards Track + Accepted". The [1] above has status "Approved" which might be the same, but why
is not there consistency in terms?
If it is approved/accepted doesn't it mean it is implemented by somebody?
[a] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/
Kalin.
--
|[ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ]|
+-> http://ThinRope.net/ <-+
|[ ______________________ ]|
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-08 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-06 22:00 [gentoo-dev] GLEP 20 /srv - Services Home Directory Support Luca Barbato
2006-01-08 15:26 ` Kalin KOZHUHAROV [this message]
2006-01-09 2:11 ` Luca Barbato
2006-01-09 8:05 ` Stuart Herbert
2006-01-09 10:31 ` Luca Barbato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43C12F3A.4030408@thinrope.net \
--to=kalin@thinrope.net \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox