From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EujeU-0000FM-Km for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2006 04:56:35 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k064tMhr025861; Fri, 6 Jan 2006 04:55:22 GMT Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k064qMbJ014185 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2006 04:52:22 GMT Received: from [192.168.0.165] (really [68.168.137.100]) by mta11.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060106045221.ODUA5278.mta11.adelphia.net@[192.168.0.165]> for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 23:52:21 -0500 Message-ID: <43BDF786.7090903@leetworks.com> Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 23:52:22 -0500 From: Andrew Muraco User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051102) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 19: Gentoo Stable Portage Tree -- ideas References: <43BDF53C.8080205@leetworks.com> In-Reply-To: <43BDF53C.8080205@leetworks.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 67ec4161-9c33-421e-b5b7-c09a9f578b65 X-Archives-Hash: 3e46fbcd858c731a2bfc871931131ce7 noticed something that doesn't make any sense: Andrew Muraco wrote: > - the existing portage code would consider +arch as a subset of arch, > the reason both keywords will exist is to maintain compatibility with > older versions of portage which will not recognize this. would make more sense as: > - portage should consider +arch as a subset of arch, however, the > reason both keywords will exist is to maintain compatibility with > older versions of portage, which will not recognize this new keyword. Thanks, Andrew Muraco -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list