From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EtenN-0005Uh-FT for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 05:33:17 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k035W4ZF017607; Tue, 3 Jan 2006 05:32:04 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k035SsQx014466 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2006 05:28:54 GMT Received: from c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net ([67.171.150.177] helo=[192.168.1.106]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1Etej8-0003kh-0x for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 05:28:54 +0000 Message-ID: <43BA0B95.5030504@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 21:28:53 -0800 From: Donnie Berkholz User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051219) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLogs and rsync time References: <43B83D16.6060803@gentoo.org> <20060101225519.1f3bec72@snowdrop.home> <43B8F44D.4080806@gentoo.org> <43B9042B.2050802@quanteam.info> <20060102150025.GA6819@pluto.atHome> <43B956DC.9060402@gentoo.org> <20060102164729.GA31727@osgiliath.brixandersen.dk> <43B961FC.10609@gentoo.org> <1136227249.7131.1.camel@vertigo.twi-31o2.org> <43B97CE7.1070101@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <43B97CE7.1070101@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 4bbd4431-81a3-43c3-84b7-4028d5f7345c X-Archives-Hash: d4f4034645e379e2cbc848711ee3bddc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Lance Albertson wrote: | See the part that I said "make sense to take out". What you described is | a perfect example of something that needs to stay. All I'm getting at is | that minor things that the package maintainer thinks isn't important to | keep in the active changelog, should be able to be removed. I'm not | implying to blindly remove changelog entries solely based on the fact | that those ebuilds are in the attic. Common sense would play here. This is a nice idea in theory, but that means maintainers will have to sit around reading the whole ChangeLog and editing it. That directly takes away from real development time, for how much benefit? The tradeoff isn't worth it to me. Thanks, Donnie -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDuguVXVaO67S1rtsRAsiBAKD0aLpFFyDmv26vLbEA9Hh4X8UGGgCg6GIT EPVU6pfW2IiFPDNGrtJX45g= =zVFO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list