From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EtVeX-0003eO-Es for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2006 19:47:33 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k02JkJFS027245; Mon, 2 Jan 2006 19:46:19 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k02Jgl1t005763 for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2006 19:42:48 GMT Received: from ip68-102-201-166.ks.ok.cox.net ([68.102.201.166] helo=[10.3.1.219]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1EtVZv-0004Jy-8V for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2006 19:42:47 +0000 Message-ID: <43B98234.1090702@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 13:42:44 -0600 From: Lance Albertson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Macintosh/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January References: <200601011053.k01ArjOh019213@robin.gentoo.org> <43B96D6D.8080107@gentoo.org> <1136226795.8779.10.camel@localhost> <43B975FD.1000401@gentoo.org> <1136228634.23404.125.camel@localhost> <1136230095.8779.32.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1136230095.8779.32.camel@localhost> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig178659A79F4B7D31064C14FF" X-Archives-Salt: 23b31c1b-3a7b-44f7-82ba-abd3d3feb7b1 X-Archives-Hash: a1ff20a52d4bb3ade4935a6c80bd7aa4 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig178659A79F4B7D31064C14FF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lares Moreau wrote: > Upon doing some reading about what _exactly_ Gentoo council does, it > seems to me that Gentoo Council is an operations board. I think what > Patrick and Lance are getting at (correct me if I'm wrong) is that we > need to have some form of Governance board. A board that doesn't worry > about implementation details; a board that gives a long term vision to > our project. No, we don't need yet another board for this. Just a single voice. Operating everything by a committee will get us no where but more bureaucracy and headaches. See my previous email about where this person would fit in. > I am a big believer is having a common goal to unite all people who work > with an organization. I'm sorry If I am repeating myself, but I feel > this is an issue that is vital to the continued success of Gentoo. Yup, I agree there. I think Gentoo is dying a slow death right now because of the lack of vision in the past few years. Thus why I brought this topic up because I'd like to see us move forward with progress. -- Lance Albertson Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager --- GPG Public Key: Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net --------------enig178659A79F4B7D31064C14FF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDuYI3QW+hXSf0t0IRAnCoAKDXsQPUyC3FuExb/E1/MnNTQ4NmOQCffZ7B ClC4i2tz0msMyIb3+L0f/Cs= =MNUa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig178659A79F4B7D31064C14FF-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list