From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1Erlsx-0004n9-Nm for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 00:43:16 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBT0gSmd022259; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 00:42:28 GMT Received: from pasmtp.tele.dk (pasmtp.tele.dk [193.162.159.95]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBT0dWTo030672 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 00:39:32 GMT Received: from [192.168.3.7] (gurlinet.dk [80.62.52.173]) by pasmtp.tele.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 593751EC323 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2005 01:39:31 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43B33045.9020903@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 01:39:33 +0100 From: Bjarke Istrup Pedersen User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Binary packages in the tree References: <20051219131909.GA31765@aerie.halcy0n.com> <20051219133755.GB31765@aerie.halcy0n.com> <20051226221649.GA26386@aerie.halcy0n.com> In-Reply-To: <20051226221649.GA26386@aerie.halcy0n.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 89e54d91-2a2b-4f00-a218-dcd230d64160 X-Archives-Hash: e961a3a43f2c2fd25b03e53bd90c1269 Mark Loeser skrev: > Mark Loeser said: > >>Mark Loeser said: >> >>>So, everyone that has a binary package in the tree, I would appreciate it if >>>you could put the sys-libs/libstdc++-v3 depend into your package if >>>necessary. >> >>Well, you can tell I didn't exactly think about this too much beforehand, >>since its been brought to my attention a virtual would probably be best for >>this, so we would handle the || ( gcc-3.3.* libstdc++ ) inside of the >>virtual. I'll make one later unless anyone has strong objections to this for >>people to use in DEPEND, instead of writing the `or` dep out. > > > Okay, I have added the new-style virtual. If you have a binary application > in the tree that requires libstdc++.so.5, please add a dep in your ebuild on > =virtual/libstdc++-3.3. Let me know if anything doesn't seem to work right. > > Thanks > Does this mean that gcc-3.4 will no longer have libstdc++ as a dependency? :-D Bjarke -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list