From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1ErQhq-00029f-RG for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 02:06:23 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBS25ZrL027069; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 02:05:35 GMT Received: from mail.tar.bz (s175249.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp [220.157.175.249]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBS23QPJ021231 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2005 02:03:27 GMT Received: (qmail 23153 invoked by uid 210); 28 Dec 2005 02:03:26 -0000 Received: from 192.168.1.122 by dorf (envelope-from , uid 89) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (clamdscan: 0.87/1096. perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:1(192.168.1.122):. Processed in 0.027747 secs); 28 Dec 2005 02:03:26 -0000 Received: from kpc.tar.bz (HELO ?192.168.1.122?) (kalin.smtp%tar.bz@192.168.1.122) by dorf.tar.bz with ESMTPA; 28 Dec 2005 02:03:26 -0000 Message-ID: <43B1F25C.7060208@thinrope.net> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 11:03:08 +0900 From: Kalin KOZHUHAROV User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051023) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Putting qa warnings to a text file instead of showing them to the world References: <43AF2BF5.4060905@gentoo.org> <43B198D9.3000900@gentoo.org> <1135713763.7402.20.camel@localhost> <43B19FB1.9010200@gentoo.org> <1135714953.7402.32.camel@localhost> <43B1EB8F.9000009@thinrope.net> <1135734803.7402.44.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1135734803.7402.44.camel@localhost> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 OpenPGP: id=26BE7385 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: ccad09a4-93c4-425f-8cdf-474c171ba132 X-Archives-Hash: f65be6012ea6bc5d601ee396f066eccf Lares Moreau wrote: > On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 10:34 +0900, Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote: > >> what about defining something like GENTOO_LEVEL="n00b|user|know_how|master|admin|dev|guru" in >> make.conf? And act acording to this, but trying to move the user up a level or two most of the >> time. > > > This is what happens anyway, but it is called FEATURES :) >>From `man make.conf` FEATURES = "sandbox ccache autoaddcvs" Defines actions portage takes by default. These options should not be changed by anyone but developers and/or maintainers. 'sandbox' is an important part of FEATURES and should not be disabled by default. This is an incremental variable. So I guess I am close to "developers and/or maintainers" as I change that on day 0 on any Gentoo box I install :-) s/'sandbox' is an important part of FEATURES and should not be disabled by default/ 'sandbox' is an important part of FEATURES and should not be disabled by default (but disabled on `emerge perl`)/g or die; I still think, GENTOO_LEVEL is a better one though. Kalin. -- |[ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ]| +-> http://ThinRope.net/ <-+ |[ ______________________ ]| -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list