public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Stupid USE defaults that need cleaning
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 00:10:04 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43B0CCAC.40006@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051227044356.GM5809@nightcrawler.e-centre.net>

Brian Harring wrote:

>On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 11:28:17PM -0500, Chandler Carruth wrote:
>  
>
>>It occurs to me that this could be (to an extent) accomplished by having
>>a few more "specialized" subprofiles for x86: base, desktop, gnome, and kde.
>>
>>base - as the name implies, a _basic_ starting point... very similar to
>>server profiles, etc. veeery minimal.
>>desktop - almost identical to the current USE flags -- what Joe Q. User
>>"should" have to be safe, and have programs function as expected.
>>gnome / kde - slight specializations of the above to tailor the use
>>flags for one desktop environ or the other..
>>
>>Problems?
>>1) heavier usage and depth of the profile, making where things come in
>>more and more obscure.
>>2) could lead to proliferation of environment tailored "desktop"
>>derivatives. (xfce, fluxbox, the list could go on) This may not be a
>>problem as many distros have successfully divided between KDE and Gnome,
>>and the base / desktop profiles would allow users ways to customize, as
>>always.
>>3) there is _no_ functionality added by any of this, only
>>"user-friendliness" after a fashion, and as such, perhaps it should all
>>be chucked in favor of having users competently declare their own global
>>USE flags during the install, however I doubt that'll get very far. *shrug*
>>    
>>
>
>4) need for the ability to inherit multiple parent profiles.
>
>Otherwise, x86 desktop profile is not guranteed in anyway to reflect 
>sparc desktop profile (yes, somewhat the case now).
>
>A gnome desktop profile would make sense imo, but from a work 
>standpoint is totally dependant on ability to inherit multiple 
>parents.
>
>~harring
>  
>
How close is that ability to portage? Is there interest/room for
help/work towards it? I would like to see a more sensible approach to
establishing default settings (USE flags not the only thing here). Would
help the confusion, and end some of the arts/no-arts, eds/no-eds madness.

Would also aid end users in beginning to customize their system rather
than simply using a default setup.

What about the other 3 problems I myself raised?

-Chandler Carruth
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



  reply	other threads:[~2005-12-27  5:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-26  5:09 [gentoo-dev] Stupid USE defaults that need cleaning Doug Goldstein
2005-12-26  6:09 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-12-26  6:22   ` Dale
2005-12-26 16:27     ` Jan Kundrát
2005-12-26  7:24   ` Doug Goldstein
2005-12-26  7:33     ` Mike Frysinger
2005-12-26 12:53       ` Bastiaan Visser
2005-12-26 13:12         ` Petteri Räty
2005-12-26 16:32           ` Jan Kundrát
2005-12-26 16:44             ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2005-12-26 18:28           ` Andrew Muraco
2005-12-26 12:45     ` Danny van Dyk
2005-12-26 11:35 ` Luca Barbato
2005-12-26 15:35 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-12-26 16:57   ` Re[2]: " Jakub Moc
2005-12-26 17:07     ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-12-26 17:53       ` Re[2]: " Jakub Moc
2005-12-26 19:15         ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2005-12-26 19:03       ` [gentoo-dev] " Carsten Lohrke
2005-12-26 20:06         ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-12-26 18:36     ` Re[2]: " Joe McCann
2005-12-26 19:00       ` Carsten Lohrke
2005-12-26 19:24       ` Re[4]: " Jakub Moc
2005-12-26 20:48         ` Joe McCann
2005-12-26 21:02           ` Stephen P. Becker
2005-12-26 21:21         ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2005-12-26 21:47           ` Re[2]: " Jakub Moc
2005-12-26 22:19       ` Lares Moreau
2005-12-26 22:28         ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-12-26 22:31         ` Andrew Muraco
2005-12-27  1:29         ` Dale
2005-12-27  4:28         ` Chandler Carruth
2005-12-27  4:43           ` Brian Harring
2005-12-27  5:10             ` Chandler Carruth [this message]
2005-12-27  5:30               ` Brian Harring
2005-12-28 17:05     ` Olivier Fisette
2005-12-30 18:07       ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-12-26 17:08 ` Simon Stelling
2005-12-26 18:34   ` Doug Goldstein

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43B0CCAC.40006@gmail.com \
    --to=chandlerc@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox