From: lnxg33k <lnxg33k@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Unified nVidia Driver Ebuild ready for testing
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 14:30:04 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43ADAFCC.5010209@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4a64cf400512240657t6ec786b3ge207579f9805c6e2@mail.gmail.com>
I'm just a user, but I personally would prefer the three separate ebuilds. If a
meta-ebuild was included as an additional way to build, that'd be fine. I
update whenever a new version comes out, but only build -kernel after updating
the kernel. This makes sense as being the most efficient way to go. As for the
"extra" packages, I don't use them and don't intend to. I know they may be
small, but that's just one more file/build that I don't have to worry about and
that clutters the system; I'm very picky about my system. Just my opinion on
this. Have a safe holiday break.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-24 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-23 17:41 [gentoo-dev] Unified nVidia Driver Ebuild ready for testing Peter
2005-12-23 18:47 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-12-23 19:05 ` [gentoo-dev] " Peter
2005-12-23 20:13 ` Stuart Herbert
2005-12-23 20:40 ` [gentoo-dev] " Peter
2005-12-23 19:43 ` [gentoo-dev] " Stephen P. Becker
2005-12-23 19:59 ` [gentoo-dev] " Peter
2005-12-23 20:15 ` Stephen P. Becker
2005-12-24 8:47 ` Niklas Bolander
2005-12-24 9:16 ` Dale
2005-12-24 11:34 ` [gentoo-dev] " Peter
2005-12-24 11:44 ` Dale
2005-12-24 12:09 ` Carsten Lohrke
2005-12-24 12:50 ` [gentoo-dev] " Peter
2005-12-24 13:09 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2005-12-24 15:31 ` [gentoo-dev] " Peter
2005-12-24 15:58 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2005-12-24 21:27 ` [gentoo-dev] " R Hill
2005-12-24 13:52 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: " Jon Portnoy
2005-12-24 14:29 ` Carsten Lohrke
2005-12-24 14:57 ` Jean-Francois Gagnon Laporte
2005-12-24 20:30 ` lnxg33k [this message]
2005-12-24 17:35 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-12-24 19:49 ` Jan Kundrát
2005-12-26 11:25 ` Rodolfo Boer
2005-12-24 20:00 ` [gentoo-dev] " Curtis Napier
2005-12-24 20:15 ` fire-eyes
2005-12-24 20:24 ` Dale
2005-12-23 20:49 ` [gentoo-dev] " Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2005-12-27 15:50 ` Henrik Brix Andersen
2005-12-27 17:55 ` [gentoo-dev] " Peter
2005-12-27 18:42 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2005-12-24 10:00 ` R Hill
2005-12-28 0:06 ` [gentoo-dev] " Paweł Madej
2005-12-28 18:40 ` [gentoo-dev] " Peter
2005-12-28 23:54 ` fire-eyes
2005-12-30 17:54 ` Chris Gianelloni
2006-01-01 1:12 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2006-01-02 13:31 ` Tres Melton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43ADAFCC.5010209@gmail.com \
--to=lnxg33k@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox