public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Curtis Napier <curtis119@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev]  Re: Unified nVidia Driver Ebuild ready for testing
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:00:47 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43ADA8EF.1010406@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43AD1205.1050403@exceedtech.net>

Dale wrote:
> Niklas Bolander wrote:
> 
>> On Friday 23 December 2005 20:59, Peter wrote:
>>  
>>
>>>> I can tell you that I would be disappointed if this replaces the 
>>>> current
>>>> ebuilds, because I really don't need to reinstall nvidia-settings and
>>>> nvidia-glx every time I build a new kernel.
>>>>     
>>>
>>> That's why we are having this dialog. When I proposed doing a unified
>>> ebuild, the objective always was to get and encourage feedback. If 
>>> you are
>>> happy keeping up with three ebuilds, then that is feedback we need to
>>> have. BTW, please post these comments to the bug report.
>>>
>>>   
>>>
>>>>> We hope you will find this approach a more streamlined and easy
>>>>> implementation for nVidia.
>>>>>       
>>>>
>>>> I don't particularly see how it is easier.
>>>>     
>>>
>>> But many do. This mirrors the approach nvidia takes.
>>>
>>>   
>>
>>
>> As another non-dev/user I must say that three separate ebuilds is 
>> preferable. The kernel ebuild must be recompiled every time I change 
>> kernel while the glx only needs to be installed once. Finaly, I have 
>> rather bad experiences of nvidia-settings and would like to avoid them 
>> at all.
>>
>> Wouldn't it be more sensible to make a nvidia-meta build that pulled 
>> in all three if the goal is pure simplicity?
>> Merry Christmas btw.
>>
>> /Niklas
>>  
>>
> I have to agree.  Do it sort of like KDE, with kde, kde-meta or as 
> seperate packages.  Have it so you can pull in all three in one emerge 
> command but have the option to do it seperately as well.  I have only 
> emerged glx once and do the nvidia-kernel when I change kernels.  I 
> really don't have any use for the settings package, as long as my GUI 
> works anyway.
> 
> Just give us some options.  We'll be happy then.
> 

Ditto. A unified build would make more work for my tired old CPU. A meta 
build would be better, give us the choice to pull it all in or one at a 
time like kde.


ps. I appreciate the original intention of trying to clean this up. Thanks!
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-12-24 20:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-23 17:41 [gentoo-dev] Unified nVidia Driver Ebuild ready for testing Peter
2005-12-23 18:47 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-12-23 19:05   ` [gentoo-dev] " Peter
2005-12-23 20:13     ` Stuart Herbert
2005-12-23 20:40       ` [gentoo-dev] " Peter
2005-12-23 19:43 ` [gentoo-dev] " Stephen P. Becker
2005-12-23 19:59   ` [gentoo-dev] " Peter
2005-12-23 20:15     ` Stephen P. Becker
2005-12-24  8:47     ` Niklas Bolander
2005-12-24  9:16       ` Dale
2005-12-24 11:34         ` [gentoo-dev] " Peter
2005-12-24 11:44           ` Dale
2005-12-24 12:09           ` Carsten Lohrke
2005-12-24 12:50             ` [gentoo-dev] " Peter
2005-12-24 13:09               ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2005-12-24 15:31                 ` [gentoo-dev] " Peter
2005-12-24 15:58                   ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2005-12-24 21:27                     ` [gentoo-dev] " R Hill
2005-12-24 13:52               ` [gentoo-dev] Re: " Jon Portnoy
2005-12-24 14:29               ` Carsten Lohrke
2005-12-24 14:57               ` Jean-Francois Gagnon Laporte
2005-12-24 20:30                 ` lnxg33k
2005-12-24 17:35               ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-12-24 19:49               ` Jan Kundrát
2005-12-26 11:25               ` Rodolfo Boer
2005-12-24 20:00         ` Curtis Napier [this message]
2005-12-24 20:15           ` [gentoo-dev] " fire-eyes
2005-12-24 20:24             ` Dale
2005-12-23 20:49 ` [gentoo-dev] " Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2005-12-27 15:50   ` Henrik Brix Andersen
2005-12-27 17:55     ` [gentoo-dev] " Peter
2005-12-27 18:42       ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2005-12-24 10:00 ` R Hill
2005-12-28  0:06 ` [gentoo-dev] " Paweł Madej
2005-12-28 18:40   ` [gentoo-dev] " Peter
2005-12-28 23:54     ` fire-eyes
2005-12-30 17:54     ` Chris Gianelloni
2006-01-01  1:12       ` Ciaran McCreesh
2006-01-02 13:31         ` Tres Melton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43ADA8EF.1010406@gentoo.org \
    --to=curtis119@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox