From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EqFSk-0000Sy-0k for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:53:54 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBOJqsw1010729; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:52:54 GMT Received: from www.suchdol.net (www.suchdol.net [82.208.33.2]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBOJni3Y016826 for ; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 19:49:44 GMT Received: from [10.18.6.61] (slon.basa.dejvice.czf [10.18.6.61]) by www.suchdol.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F36089 for ; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 20:49:44 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43ADA64D.4000005@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 20:49:33 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan_Kundr=E1t?= Organization: Gentoo Linux User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051214) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Unified nVidia Driver Ebuild ready for testing References: <43AD1205.1050403@exceedtech.net> <200512241309.44268.carlo@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigEFDEEDE54FB77BF02D9537D6" X-Archives-Salt: 4f8ba49e-166f-4c49-9c1d-1923e6c14091 X-Archives-Hash: b3cee0149a80e7509dc44f293275d6d3 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigEFDEEDE54FB77BF02D9537D6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Peter wrote: > Also, I find it absolutely fascinating that the only people against this > concept are devs, and the only people for it are users. Please see Message-ID: <43AD1205.1050403@exceedtech.net> (for those using MUAs that suck, it's "Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 03:16:53 -0600", "From: Dale " in this thread). > If you are against meta ebuilds, what is your opinion on KDE? Instead on 9 > (or so) packages, there are now over 250! Are 250 separate ebuilds better? > I cannot think of another distro that slices up KDE that way. Meta > ebuilds at least allow the user the ability to opt out of trying to > decide which ebuilds to emerge! You seem to be confused by split ebuilds and meta ebuilds. Cheers, -jkt -- cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth --------------enigEFDEEDE54FB77BF02D9537D6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDraZVamXfqERyJRcRAufsAJ9EoW7ohhYxIoUBqll8dOjKdIkAiACfVDXu gBt4nS1OeZMutaQS16TYVMU= =id4e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigEFDEEDE54FB77BF02D9537D6-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list