From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EpsBH-0006hx-0e for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 19:02:19 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBNJ1DxX024631; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 19:01:13 GMT Received: from buggy.blubb.ch (cable-static-87-245-102-53.shinternet.ch [87.245.102.53]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBNIvDj7012589 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:57:13 GMT Received: from aqua ([192.168.10.5]) by buggy.blubb.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1Eps4w-0002Nx-0j for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 19:55:46 +0100 Message-ID: <43AC4889.5090503@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 19:57:13 +0100 From: Simon Stelling User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: pkg_{pre,post}inst misusage References: <200512231910.56795.jstubbs@gentoo.org> <200512232200.20217.jstubbs@gentoo.org> <20051223131325.GA12712@gentoo.org> <200512240222.06574.jstubbs@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: f9ba6cd5-daad-4734-8959-7c4cb6a4f091 X-Archives-Hash: 702954d23a1f2b9d7ef7f8eccb586872 Duncan wrote: > It just sounds like it /could/ be dangerous to me. For some reason, I > don't like the idea of something that could hose a system that badly! =8^\ It won't hose your system badly, since you've got /usr/lib64 listed in /etc/ld.so.conf. I agree it wouldn't be very nice though. -- Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 Operational Co-Lead blubb@gentoo.org -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list