Mark Loeser wrote:

>Well, you can tell I didn't exactly think about this too much beforehand,
>since its been brought to my attention a virtual would probably be best for
>this, so we would handle the || ( gcc-3.3.* libstdc++ ) inside of the
>virtual.  I'll make one later unless anyone has strong objections to this for
>people to use in DEPEND, instead of writing the `or` dep out.
>
>  
>
Since gcc-3.4 is the stable version now, the best would be || (
libstdc++ gcc-3.3.* ) .