From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EmXTs-0006NM-BH for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:19:44 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jBEEJ0X8022101; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:19:00 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jBEEHAJH031969 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:17:11 GMT Received: from align.cns.ksu.edu ([129.130.0.165]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1EmXRO-0002oB-EP for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:17:10 +0000 Message-ID: <43A02965.7040306@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 08:17:09 -0600 From: Lance Albertson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Macintosh/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gee, wouldn't it be nice (security bugs)... References: <1134558021.6530.3.camel@sys947.dtic.mil> <20051214135500.GC22730@toucan.gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20051214135500.GC22730@toucan.gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig710DAA70939A4CF95A9142FF" X-Archives-Salt: 5706ec88-0093-40de-95be-8841664820bb X-Archives-Hash: 1231d3207cf082477d63b4247d0ecd39 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig710DAA70939A4CF95A9142FF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 06:00:21AM -0500, Michael Cummings wrote: > >>Gee, wouldn't it be nice for us lazy folks if the word [Security] (in >>some common fashion) were included in the summary line of security >>related bugs? > > > this really should have been sent to the security mailing list and > cc-ed the security team > > this has come up before on those lists, i just dont remember the > outcome :P Don't forget about jforman! -- Lance Albertson Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager --- GPG Public Key: Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net --------------enig710DAA70939A4CF95A9142FF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDoCllQW+hXSf0t0IRAoTcAKDvJ4Kus3ThldsxNvZ5b46GDuk9egCfWgvG guL6EhISXBeWptFu4y9qLHg= =diB/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig710DAA70939A4CF95A9142FF-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list