From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X porting: dependency changes
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 10:03:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <439723ED.3020908@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200512072139.16592.jstubbs@gentoo.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jason Stubbs wrote:
| On Wednesday 07 December 2005 17:03, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
|
|>Donnie Berkholz wrote:
|>| As far as progress on this issue, we're looking into adopting glep 37
|>| and creating a virtual/x11 ebuild to address this.
|>
|>I've just committed virtual/x11 to the tree. See
|>https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112896 if you run into any
|>problems with it.
|>
|>It won't work properly with macos yet because they use a "fake" package,
|>so they'll have to hang on to virtual/x11 in the profiles.
|
|
| It should work if the listed package matches what the macos profiles
have in
| package.provided...
Please do try adding the section and running repoman, then, from an x86
profile.
|>I plan to remove the virtual/x11 definition from base/virtuals in a
|>couple of days, because this should provide a full (and non-broken)
|>replacement.
|
|
| This can be easily tested in advance by adding the following:
|
| # cat /etc/portage/profile/virtuals
| virtual/x11 -*
Well, I've already tested locally by just removing the line from
base/virtuals. But yes, that does sound like a nice, non-overwritable
way to do it. =)
Thanks,
Donnie
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDlyPtXVaO67S1rtsRAunBAJoD0hJmFdnrxGghdpusrvGqHXgAIACdESjv
Kwx4QY+EOdteHzyXaxrfzYE=
=xrrk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-07 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-21 20:50 [gentoo-dev] Modular X porting: dependency changes Donnie Berkholz
2005-11-21 21:05 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2005-11-21 21:11 ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-11-21 23:20 ` Carsten Lohrke
2005-11-22 3:15 ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-11-22 5:21 ` Joshua Baergen
2005-11-22 6:43 ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-11-22 15:06 ` Doug Goldstein
2005-11-22 15:46 ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-11-22 16:30 ` Jason Stubbs
2005-11-22 9:13 ` Grobian
2005-12-01 2:53 ` Lina Pezzella
2005-12-01 8:13 ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-12-07 8:03 ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-12-07 12:39 ` Jason Stubbs
2005-12-07 18:03 ` Donnie Berkholz [this message]
2005-12-09 19:30 ` Donnie Berkholz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=439723ED.3020908@gentoo.org \
--to=spyderous@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox