From: Andrew Muraco <tuxp3@leetworks.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving GCC-3.4 to stable on x86
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 15:07:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <438E068F.7020804@leetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051130200005.GA17628@superlupo.rechner>
Wernfried Haas wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 01:56:40PM -0500, Mark Loeser wrote:
>
>
>>Seems people read this to mean that I was going to write a doc, which I have
>>no intentions on doing.
>>
>>
>I don't think a whole doc is necessary, but instructions for a safe
>upgrade would be fine. A think a one-liner like
>emerge -u gcc && emerge -e system && emerge -e world && emerge -P gcc
>&& emerge whateverneedstobedoneafterwards should suffice as documentation.
>
>
>
>>I believe adding "It is recommended that you `emerge
>>-e system && emerge -e world` after merging gcc-3.4" to the einfo at the end
>>of the gcc-3.4.4 install should be good enough.
>>
>>
>Maybe people look closer if they upgrade gcc, but einfo still gets
>overlooked easily.
>
>
>
>>So, let me know if marking it stable in the next day or two is completely
>>stupid and I should wait to announce this via the GWN or something, or if its
>>an alright move and people aren't going to stab me for marking it stable.
>>
>>
>Assuming a clear upgrade path is provided i think it would be
>fine. We'll make some sticky thread on the forum mentioning that
>instructions, i bet it couldn't hurt to put them on the gentoo
>mainpage, as topic in #gentoo etc. I'm also pretty sure next GWN is
>likely to report about the update.
>Just because we haven't got emerge --news it doesn't mean we haven't
>got lots of ways to reach our users. Every user that gets to read them
>in time is a potential bug report less.
>
>cheers,
> Wernfried
>
>
Personally, I would set a date next week, so that way GWN and other
places can be prepare for this, a definate date for users to know that
it IS going to happen, and I personally think that a sticky on the forum
(i would even be willing to write a little something, but i'm no expert)
is a minimum. A full out doc with all the FAQ and important notes about
what needs to be recompiled (in my opinion) would be a much more through
upgrade path, ofcourse still include the einfo quick instructions. But I
think the masses of users will not be happy when they realize that
emerge -e world && emerge -e world means that they will be compiling for
the next day (or 2 or 3), so a way to block the upgrade from messing up
people that wish to keep 3.3.x as default would be a good idea.
just my $.02
Tux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-30 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-28 14:22 [gentoo-dev] Moving GCC-3.4 to stable on x86 Mark Loeser
2005-11-28 14:46 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-11-28 18:12 ` Bjarke Istrup Pedersen
2005-11-28 22:24 ` Daniel Gryniewicz
2005-11-28 23:11 ` [gentoo-dev] " R Hill
2005-11-29 2:30 ` [gentoo-dev] " Mike Frysinger
2005-11-29 2:40 ` Mark Loeser
2005-11-29 8:51 ` Gregorio Guidi
2005-11-29 9:04 ` Paul de Vrieze
2005-11-29 9:53 ` Graham Murray
2005-11-29 10:09 ` Paul de Vrieze
2005-11-29 14:50 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-29 15:03 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-11-29 15:42 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-29 15:52 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-29 16:04 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-11-29 17:37 ` Andreas Proschofsky
2005-11-29 18:26 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-12-01 17:26 ` Paul Varner
2005-11-29 16:51 ` Peter Ruskin
2005-11-29 8:56 ` Paul de Vrieze
2005-11-29 11:18 ` Henrik Brix Andersen
2005-11-29 13:18 ` Paul de Vrieze
2005-11-29 13:21 ` Mark Loeser
2005-11-29 13:50 ` Curtis Napier
2005-11-29 14:03 ` William Kenworthy
2005-11-29 16:38 ` Tres Melton
2005-11-29 15:50 ` Henrik Brix Andersen
2005-11-29 15:01 ` Mike Williams
2005-11-29 15:39 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-30 4:41 ` Andrew Muraco
2005-11-30 14:06 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-30 14:16 ` tuxp3
2005-11-30 14:25 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-11-30 14:45 ` Graham Murray
2005-11-30 18:56 ` Mark Loeser
2005-11-30 19:25 ` Petteri Räty
2005-11-30 20:00 ` Wernfried Haas
2005-11-30 20:07 ` Andrew Muraco [this message]
2005-11-30 20:12 ` Mark Loeser
2005-11-30 20:16 ` Andrew Muraco
2005-11-30 20:51 ` Georgi Georgiev
2005-11-30 21:13 ` Andrew Muraco
2005-11-30 21:19 ` Mark Loeser
2005-12-01 4:41 ` Lares Moreau
2005-12-01 5:17 ` [gentoo-dev] " R Hill
2005-12-01 11:50 ` Jason Wever
2005-12-01 12:47 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-12-01 14:33 ` Lares Moreau
2005-11-30 21:19 ` [gentoo-dev] " Peter Ruskin
2005-11-30 21:27 ` Re[2]: " Jakub Moc
2005-11-30 22:15 ` Peter Ruskin
2005-11-30 22:48 ` Harald van Dijk
2005-11-30 21:31 ` Simon Strandman
2005-11-30 22:34 ` Philip Webb
2005-11-30 22:42 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-11-30 22:43 ` Grant Goodyear
2005-11-30 22:48 ` Mark Loeser
2005-11-30 23:29 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-30 23:41 ` Re[2]: " Jakub Moc
2005-11-30 23:50 ` Mark Loeser
2005-12-01 0:30 ` Marien Zwart
2005-12-01 0:53 ` Re[2]: " Jakub Moc
2005-12-01 1:07 ` Marien Zwart
2005-12-02 2:03 ` Matthias Langer
2005-12-02 2:14 ` Matthias Langer
2005-12-01 1:19 ` Philip Webb
2005-12-01 9:19 ` Petteri Räty
2005-11-30 21:34 ` solar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=438E068F.7020804@leetworks.com \
--to=tuxp3@leetworks.com \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox