From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EgoLs-0003hW-89 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 19:07:48 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jASJ5PTV025468; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 19:05:25 GMT Received: from centrmmtao05.cox.net (centrmmtao05.cox.net [70.168.83.79]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jASIxm30030412 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:59:49 GMT Received: from [10.3.1.3] (really [68.102.201.166]) by centrmmtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20051128185844.UZFU5868.centrmmtao05.cox.net@[10.3.1.3]> for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 13:58:44 -0500 Message-ID: <438B539F.6060006@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 12:59:43 -0600 From: Lance Albertson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051026) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Misquoted in the GWN References: <20051128094800.GA32340@dmz.brixandersen.dk> <20051128175430.0ebd4f4b@snowdrop.home> <1133203617.24689.5.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1133203617.24689.5.camel@localhost> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig2A06A68C9FB01EAF2925C4B1" X-Archives-Salt: 1156b9ca-47d9-436c-9045-15c1d95195b5 X-Archives-Hash: 012bbf49a7c79fcf6a6fd98ce5b2500c This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig2A06A68C9FB01EAF2925C4B1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Patrick Lauer wrote: >>Also, why not bring back the "post to -core" requirement? Make it a >>rule that it can't be labelled as an official Gentoo publication unless >>it gets some review... > > Why not bring back the "the GWN is a community thing and YOU can also contribute!!!" mentality? > > That Ulrich and I have made some suboptimal decisions in the past is a > fact, but why aren't there more contributors to the GWN so that we two > aren't single points of failure? That doesn't justify the reasoning of misquoting him. This could have been caught if it would have been sent to -core like its been done in the past. How can we contribute if you don't post what you're going to send before you send it? Cheers- -- Lance Albertson Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager --- GPG Public Key: Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net --------------enig2A06A68C9FB01EAF2925C4B1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDi1OjQW+hXSf0t0IRAkQoAJ9GWwvX78ke/cQlegmelrtQ3/+FggCfXX4b hiuN28IsoomJHrZe3tIYwR4= =lh8F -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig2A06A68C9FB01EAF2925C4B1-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list