From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EghH7-0000jz-1E for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 11:34:25 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jASBXiUI000440; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 11:33:44 GMT Received: from buggy.blubb.ch (range21-65.shlink.ch [217.148.7.65]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jASBUTTc026507 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 11:30:29 GMT Received: from chief ([192.168.10.2]) by buggy.blubb.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Egh6K-0008PV-87; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 12:23:16 +0100 Message-ID: <438AEA54.40107@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 12:30:28 +0100 From: Simon Stelling User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051023) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org CC: gwn-feedback@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Misquoted in the GWN References: <20051128094800.GA32340@dmz.brixandersen.dk> In-Reply-To: <20051128094800.GA32340@dmz.brixandersen.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: ad888491-3aa9-4554-88f5-fce6757a43ca X-Archives-Hash: 4b989fb9deb41d65a5d529f34070bcd4 Is there a good reason for sending this to -dev? You basically complain about the way the GWN authors handled the issue, so why do you tell it all the devs? It seems a bit like a lame attempt to blame them in public for their faults. Other than that, I agree with you. -- Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 Operational Co-Lead blubb@gentoo.org -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list