From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.105.134.102] (helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dj3H0-0003tS-Po for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 22:55:47 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j5GMs66x020085; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 22:54:06 GMT Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.200]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j5GMowOa015184 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 22:50:58 GMT Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 13so596295nzn for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:50:59 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=X0dMTASamhOccbZJsUqn0OsWbvtbyQXtLlUgmFh/wCIAk426ZEvwpSdDVVq7vfEnGAkra4s6VJYAhByBJz9EeAFxobkQPKwwK4WTxy0lG3OuEJiKFmJx3EZoSe+SwuFJ9LYXLE848XNJW3WkMCNeck7QAAEABoK4RtcGkhs75uo= Received: by 10.36.61.12 with SMTP id j12mr869308nza; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:50:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.77.1 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:50:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <43872d3705061615505d323215@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 00:50:59 +0200 From: "Beber [Gentoo]" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual - xlocker? In-Reply-To: <1118935712.14164.58.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline References: <42B192CC.6090001@gentoo.org> <42B1943E.6030604@gentoo.org> <1118935712.14164.58.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id j5GMowOa015184 X-Archives-Salt: b1c5ebe6-920a-48c3-851a-49f9cdf7a72f X-Archives-Hash: d13a7ed3748c9749d07ab0f00f9bd2bd On 6/16/05, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 18:01 +0300, Alin Dobre wrote: > > Jonathan Smith wrote: > > > The desktop-misc herd (which was sadly neglected until recently) could > > > benefit from a new virtual. x11-misc/xautolock is a wrapper which locks > > > the screen via any appropriate program such as xlockmore or xtrlock. > > > > xscreensaver locks the screen, too, besides its normal screensaver > > features (like xlockmore). > > > > > This program needs to depend on an xlocker, but we should not lock users > > > into one specific one. > > > > > > See bug 95246 [1] > > > > > > I would probably name it virtual/xlocker, but other suggestions are, of > > > course, welcome. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > [1]: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95246 > > > > > You don't have to setup a virtual for this. In fact, the simpler method > (especially when dealing with only one package) is to use the || *DEPEND > syntax. > > RDEPEND="|| ( > x11-misc/xscreensaver > x11-misc/xlockmore > x11-misc/xtrlock )" > > This would prefer xscreensaver over the others, but any would satisfy > the dependency. Hi guys, thanks for you to look of my reply on this bug :) It don't think that a virtual need to be use here. 3 softwares for a virtual is quite less. Why are you placing a REDEPEND instead of a PDEPEND ? xautolock *doesn't need* on of theses software to compile. It need one of them to be usable. Is the side, it's a post depend. ++ Beber -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list