From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Efbs6-0000Zo-SB for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:36:07 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAPBZPTQ026089; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:35:25 GMT Received: from insecure.ws (insecure.ws [82.231.161.45]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAPBWnig023467 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:32:49 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by insecure.ws (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50AE059412 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:27:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from insecure.ws ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (insecure.ws [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21952-11 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:27:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from [0.0.0.0] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by insecure.ws (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC3FF5940E for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:27:20 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4387003D.9050800@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:14:53 +0000 From: kang User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051026) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Update of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org References: <438174BD.9060100@gentoo.org> <4381791C.8030005@gentoo.org> <43840EED.2010909@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <43840EED.2010909@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at insecure.ws X-Archives-Salt: c82589e2-2104-44c8-81b3-3d2265adc913 X-Archives-Hash: 2e096b9e1208c53c98a2a3d3f25f2ba9 Curtis Napier wrote: > gentoo.org and all domains owned by the Gentoo Foundation should > render correctly in all browsers that are still in general use. IE5 on > the mac is still a valid browser and will be supported as much as > possible. > IE5 for mac contains unfixed security issues which won't be fixed (as announced by MS), how is that considered supported ? Is it even still distributed within MacOSX Tiger ? http://secunia.com/graph/?type=sol&period=all&prod=2678 http://secunia.com/advisories/13356/ http://secunia.com/advisories/12920/ http://secunia.com/advisories/10500/ Now people can also use NCSA Mosaic. It's valid as long as you can run it. But a browser with vulns, unsupported by the vendor, with a broken CSS, I think you do not have to support it. Well of course, if you like it just do it ;) Oh btw, *great* progress on the design. Two things that I still find a bit wrong though: - I find code boxes ugly. Maybe its some useability thing, is easier to see, I dont' know, but its ugly ;) - The bottom boxes are uneven in size, it looks a bit strange. Also i still wonder about this whole concept, as its not the first place you look for links. I'll take an example: http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org/doc/en/index.xml I am in 1024x768 and I don't see the boxes if I don't scroll. I don't think you acn reduce every page so that you see them without scrolling. Unfortunately I dont see any good solution. Maybe it'll stay this way. I would put more than 2 news items on the front page then, even if it also hides the boxes a bit on 800x600 or 1024, because it doesnt give much info to have 2 items per news page ;) -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list