From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EfYnd-0007GP-4I for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 08:19:17 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAP8IaTr011029; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 08:18:36 GMT Received: from smtp106.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp106.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.229.99]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAP8GjKD007556 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 08:16:45 GMT Received: (qmail 69662 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2005 08:16:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.5?) (curtis119@sbcglobal.net@69.214.158.132 with plain) by smtp106.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Nov 2005 08:16:44 -0000 Message-ID: <4386C864.8050109@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 03:16:36 -0500 From: Curtis Napier User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051114) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, www-redesign@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Update of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org References: <438174BD.9060100@gentoo.org> <4381791C.8030005@gentoo.org> <43840EED.2010909@gentoo.org> <20051123112111.GG2257@toucan.gentoo.org> <4386A441.5050409@gentoo.org> <20051125090651.30fb5866@pingviinilohhari> In-Reply-To: <20051125090651.30fb5866@pingviinilohhari> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 644a9cba-c1af-45f2-a4f0-021c43047400 X-Archives-Hash: 5e11411651bb8427e57f78a95caf8611 Flammie Pirinen wrote: > 2005-11-25, Curtis Napier sanoi, jotta: > > >>I honestly thought that the changes I made were better from an >>accessibility standpoint. I guess I was wrong. > > > Not really. > > >>So on that note, I've gone over the design and gotten it closer to >>Aarons's reference. [...] Check out what I did change in the meantime. > > > Uh-oh. The usability regression from what the site was yesterday is > unbelievable. Almost all of the texts are too small to read again, and > the color combinations are also unreadable again. I hope that you and > Aaron are still going to take into account at least all the usability > related requests from the feedback you asked, because I'd be pretty > annoyed to see yet another web site redesign that manages to make > original website even more unusable than it was. > Sorry, I should have been a little more clear. What I meant in my last email is that I would get the site to match Aarons current reference and then he and I, working together as a team, would then address all the issues that were brought up during the last round of feedback. Aarons input as the designer will be make it so much easier to make sure those accessibilty/other feedack is incorporated in a way that is pleasing to look at and integrates with Aarons original design. This is how it should have been done from the beginning as I already said in my last email. Sorry for any confusion. ps. I'm moving all discussion of this to the www-redesign@gentoo.org mailing list. I'll start a new thread there right now. Anyone who wants to participate should sign up for that list. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list