From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Eei2n-0000Wb-E0 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 23:59:25 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAMNwiEl010322; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 23:58:44 GMT Received: from centrmmtao06.cox.net (centrmmtao06.cox.net [70.168.83.78]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAMNuuPq017946 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 23:56:56 GMT Received: from [10.3.1.3] (really [68.102.201.166]) by centrmmtao06.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20051122235540.RAMJ13557.centrmmtao06.cox.net@[10.3.1.3]> for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 18:55:40 -0500 Message-ID: <4383B046.1060209@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 17:56:54 -0600 From: Lance Albertson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051026) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain References: <1132333748.8524.9.camel@localhost> <20051118173243.GA16034@dmz.brixandersen.dk> <437E4F3E.5070705@gentoo.org> <20051118221428.15ba3adb@snowdrop.home> <437E5965.10502@gentoo.org> <20051118235829.GC12958@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <3610591862.20051119010748@gentoo.org> <437E7B49.7080204@gentoo.org> <20051119194848.GC28867@gentoo.org> <1132439575.4100.20.camel@disoft-dc.keine.ath.cx> <20051123001927.0641dc5d@sven.genone.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <20051123001927.0641dc5d@sven.genone.homeip.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig9E75302CD20096E3B4BB82A2" X-Archives-Salt: d5e3b2fa-f7e8-4afc-8b9d-23064f28b4c4 X-Archives-Hash: 5473f8b3501cd24fb5e0a768b851a211 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig9E75302CD20096E3B4BB82A2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Marius Mauch wrote: > On Sun, 20 Nov 2005 09:32:55 +1100 > Ben Skeggs wrote: > > >>Anyway, the most important reason for the GLEP (IMO) is giving AT's >>r/o access to CVS. When working on bugs, it's always fun to find out >>that the problem has already been resolved and just hasn't made it to >>your local rsync mirror yet.. > > > Out of curiosity, what's the more important aspect of r/o cvs: > - more up to date Not necessarily true. We would not have the anon cvs access from our primary cvs server. It would be synced on a regular basis to a separate box. The newer cvs (which isn't on lark yet) may give us capabilities to have a more 'live' cvs anon system. But as of now, the best infra can provide is 30 minute updates. I don't want to poll the cvs more than that to keep down the load. > - easier selective updates Yup, that's definitely a plus. -- Lance Albertson Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager --- GPG Public Key: Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net --------------enig9E75302CD20096E3B4BB82A2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDg7BGQW+hXSf0t0IRAmZCAJ4zEVRR+Ux3s55DDd6IbHj4yCuyiwCfT6dA 890zd4B+ggH/JyRRQsHTXKs= =Sdwn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig9E75302CD20096E3B4BB82A2-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list