From: Alec Joseph Warner <warnera6@egr.msu.edu>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Decision to remove stage1/2 from installation documentation
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 15:42:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <438382BD.70904@egr.msu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <977302213.20051122211620@gentoo.org>
Jakub Moc wrote:
> 22.11.2005, 20:57:15, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
>
>
>>The idea was to move out the stage1/stage2 docs to somewhere else. Then
>>create some sort of "Advanced Installation Topics" guide or something, to
>>list out the replacement procedures for customizing a system from a stage3
>>tarball, then, eventually, drop the stage1 and stage2 tarballs.
>
>
> Erm, did you read what solar wrote about hardened stages and why should stage1
> still stay?
>
>
>>I was working on the idea of doing it all in stages. The "problem" occurred
>>from people freaking out because they didn't bother reading the entire news
>>blurb that tells exactly where the instructions moved to, plus links to the
>>bug # and discussion. There's also this nice section in the Handbook.
I'd point out that this was not well executed as a major change should
have been. We talked of major package changes, apache config changes,
of package breakage. Then one day you up and remove what some consider
a vital part of installing with no warning. Announcements earlier
noting the pending removal of tarballs to say, g-announce and this list
would probably have stifled much of the complains ( see the news hit
gentoo-wiki, gentoo-portage, and the community ). Otherwise yeah, you
will get a knee-jerk reaction, many users think you just screwed them
out of something. Nevermind the fact that they are wrong and uninformed
( in most cases ) you did a crappy job of conveying the message of what
when and why.
>>"A stage3 tarball is an archive containing a minimal Gentoo environment,
>>suitable to continue the Gentoo installation using the instructions in
>>this manual. Previously, the Gentoo Handbook described the installation
>>using one of three stage tarballs. While Gentoo still offers stage1 and
>>stage2 tarballs, the official installation method uses the stage3
>>tarball. If you are interested in performing a Gentoo installation using
>>a stage1 or stage2 tarball, please read the Gentoo FAQ on How do I
>>Install Gentoo Using a Stage1 or Stage2 Tarball?"
>
>
> That FAQ section has nothing in common with the original stage1 docs. Sorry,
> installing stage3 to remove all the use flags cruft subsequently, bootstrap and
> re-emerge the system and then ponder which packages are not needed any more
> (again, there's no reliable tool to remove unneeded stuff from system, I've
> already mentioned this once) - hmmm... :/
>
> And - once stages 1+2 are removed (as you are suggesting above), then I'll
> install the system only to build my own stage1 w/ catalyst, then reformat and
> start over with my own stage? Ah, that makes live sooo much easier ;p
>
Personally if releng is already making stages 1 and 2 for the liveCD's I
see no reason not to give that work away to the community. Stick it in
some unsupported/ section on the mirrors and tell people so. Why throw
away the work you did making the liveCD? Can you quantify the number of
bugs here?
-Alec Warner (antarus)
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-22 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 94+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-22 14:47 [gentoo-dev] Decision to remove stage1/2 from installation documentation Kurt Lieber
2005-11-22 14:37 ` Andrea Barisani
2005-11-22 15:14 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-22 15:26 ` Marc Hildebrand
2005-11-22 15:48 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-22 16:15 ` Wernfried Haas
2005-11-22 16:33 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-22 19:13 ` Wernfried Haas
2005-11-23 4:58 ` [gentoo-dev] " R Hill
2005-11-23 5:15 ` Dan Meltzer
2005-11-23 6:16 ` R Hill
2005-11-23 11:41 ` Duncan
2005-11-23 7:04 ` Abhay Kedia
2005-11-22 15:29 ` [gentoo-dev] " solar
2005-11-22 15:38 ` Stephen P. Becker
2005-11-22 15:47 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-11-22 15:58 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-22 16:25 ` solar
2005-11-22 16:40 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-22 15:40 ` Andrea Barisani
2005-11-23 5:19 ` [gentoo-dev] " R Hill
2005-11-23 5:36 ` Dale
2005-11-23 6:08 ` Brian Harring
2005-11-23 5:43 ` Tuan Van
2005-11-23 20:05 ` [gentoo-dev] " Mike Owen
2005-11-23 20:13 ` Dan Meltzer
2005-11-23 21:16 ` Mike Owen
2005-11-23 21:21 ` Dan Meltzer
2005-11-23 21:31 ` Bruno
2005-11-22 14:53 ` Stephen P. Becker
2005-11-22 15:15 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-22 16:19 ` [gentoo-dev] " Thomas Kirchner
2005-11-22 16:39 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-22 17:12 ` Harald van Dijk
2005-11-22 17:51 ` Simon Stelling
2005-11-22 17:59 ` Re[2]: " Jakub Moc
2005-11-22 18:08 ` Joe McCann
2005-11-22 17:40 ` Abhay Kedia
2005-11-22 18:02 ` Stephen P. Becker
2005-11-22 18:48 ` Abhay Kedia
2005-11-22 18:59 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-22 19:23 ` Abhay Kedia
2005-11-22 18:13 ` Danny van Dyk
2005-11-22 18:20 ` Re[2]: " Jakub Moc
2005-11-22 18:47 ` Danny van Dyk
2005-11-23 17:30 ` Sven Vermeulen
2005-11-22 18:03 ` [gentoo-dev] " Grant Goodyear
2005-11-22 18:16 ` Re[2]: " Jakub Moc
2005-11-22 18:17 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-11-22 19:04 ` Grant Goodyear
2005-11-22 19:47 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-22 18:29 ` Daniel Ostrow
2005-11-24 20:49 ` [gentoo-dev] [OT] " lnxg33k
2005-11-25 14:28 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-12-02 5:21 ` lnxg33k
2005-11-22 19:06 ` [gentoo-dev] " Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-22 19:28 ` Grant Goodyear
2005-11-22 19:57 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-22 20:16 ` Re[2]: " Jakub Moc
2005-11-22 20:28 ` Alexey Chumakov
2005-11-22 21:02 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-22 20:42 ` Alec Joseph Warner [this message]
2005-11-22 21:13 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-22 20:58 ` Re[2]: " Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-22 21:36 ` Re[4]: " Jakub Moc
2005-11-22 23:26 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-23 0:55 ` Re[6]: " Jakub Moc
2005-11-23 1:09 ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-11-23 1:13 ` Mark Loeser
2005-11-23 1:30 ` Re[6]: " George Prowse
2005-11-23 10:25 ` Paul de Vrieze
2005-11-23 11:06 ` Re[8]: " Jakub Moc
2005-11-23 13:01 ` Ned Ludd
2005-11-23 13:19 ` Ned Ludd
2005-11-23 15:57 ` Henrik Brix Andersen
2005-11-23 14:16 ` solar
2005-11-23 13:50 ` Paul de Vrieze
2005-11-22 15:10 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-22 15:26 ` Henrik Brix Andersen
2005-11-22 15:49 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-22 15:54 ` Lance Albertson
2005-11-22 16:06 ` Andrew Gaffney
2005-11-22 16:18 ` Lance Albertson
2005-11-22 16:30 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-22 17:15 ` Lance Albertson
2005-11-22 18:37 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-22 17:24 ` Re[2]: " Jakub Moc
2005-11-22 16:56 ` Benjamin Judas
2005-11-22 20:54 ` Henrik Brix Andersen
2005-11-22 18:06 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-11-23 4:01 ` Andrew Muraco
2005-11-23 9:24 ` Paul de Vrieze
2005-11-23 14:12 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-24 5:26 ` Sven Vermeulen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=438382BD.70904@egr.msu.edu \
--to=warnera6@egr.msu.edu \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox