public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alec Joseph Warner <warnera6@egr.msu.edu>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Decision to remove stage1/2 from installation documentation
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 15:42:37 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <438382BD.70904@egr.msu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <977302213.20051122211620@gentoo.org>



Jakub Moc wrote:
> 22.11.2005, 20:57:15, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> 
> 
>>The idea was to move out the stage1/stage2 docs to somewhere else.  Then
>>create some sort of "Advanced Installation Topics" guide or something, to
>>list out the replacement procedures for customizing a system from a stage3
>>tarball, then, eventually, drop the stage1 and stage2 tarballs.
> 
> 
> Erm, did you read what solar wrote about hardened stages and why should stage1
> still stay?
> 
> 
>>I was working on the idea of doing it all in stages.  The "problem" occurred
>>from people freaking out because they didn't bother reading the entire news
>>blurb that tells exactly where the instructions moved to, plus links to the
>>bug # and discussion.  There's also this nice section in the Handbook.

I'd point out that this was not well executed as a major change should 
have been.  We talked of major package changes, apache config changes, 
of package breakage.  Then one day you up and remove what some consider 
a vital part of installing with no warning.  Announcements earlier 
noting the pending removal of tarballs to say, g-announce and this list 
would probably have stifled much of the complains ( see the news hit 
gentoo-wiki, gentoo-portage, and the community ).  Otherwise yeah, you 
will get a knee-jerk reaction, many users think you just screwed them 
out of something.  Nevermind the fact that they are wrong and uninformed 
( in most cases ) you did a crappy job of conveying the message of what 
when and why.

>>"A stage3 tarball is an archive containing a minimal Gentoo environment,
>>suitable to continue the Gentoo installation using the instructions in
>>this manual. Previously, the Gentoo Handbook described the installation
>>using one of three stage tarballs. While Gentoo still offers stage1 and
>>stage2 tarballs, the official installation method uses the stage3
>>tarball. If you are interested in performing a Gentoo installation using
>>a stage1 or stage2 tarball, please read the Gentoo FAQ on How do I
>>Install Gentoo Using a Stage1 or Stage2 Tarball?"
> 
> 
> That FAQ section has nothing in common with the original stage1 docs. Sorry,
> installing stage3 to remove all the use flags cruft subsequently, bootstrap and
> re-emerge the system and then ponder which packages are not needed any more
> (again, there's no reliable tool to remove unneeded stuff from system, I've
> already mentioned this once) - hmmm... :/
> 
> And - once stages 1+2 are removed (as you are suggesting above), then I'll
> install the system only to build my own stage1 w/ catalyst, then reformat and
> start over with my own stage? Ah, that makes live sooo much easier ;p
> 

Personally if releng is already making stages 1 and 2 for the liveCD's I 
see no reason not to give that work away to the community.  Stick it in 
some unsupported/ section on the mirrors and tell people so.  Why throw 
away the work you did making the liveCD?  Can you quantify the number of 
bugs here?

-Alec Warner (antarus)
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-11-22 20:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 94+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-22 14:47 [gentoo-dev] Decision to remove stage1/2 from installation documentation Kurt Lieber
2005-11-22 14:37 ` Andrea Barisani
2005-11-22 15:14   ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-22 15:26     ` Marc Hildebrand
2005-11-22 15:48       ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-22 16:15         ` Wernfried Haas
2005-11-22 16:33           ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-22 19:13             ` Wernfried Haas
2005-11-23  4:58         ` [gentoo-dev] " R Hill
2005-11-23  5:15           ` Dan Meltzer
2005-11-23  6:16             ` R Hill
2005-11-23 11:41               ` Duncan
2005-11-23  7:04           ` Abhay Kedia
2005-11-22 15:29     ` [gentoo-dev] " solar
2005-11-22 15:38       ` Stephen P. Becker
2005-11-22 15:47         ` Mike Frysinger
2005-11-22 15:58       ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-22 16:25         ` solar
2005-11-22 16:40           ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-22 15:40     ` Andrea Barisani
2005-11-23  5:19       ` [gentoo-dev] " R Hill
2005-11-23  5:36         ` Dale
2005-11-23  6:08           ` Brian Harring
2005-11-23  5:43         ` Tuan Van
2005-11-23 20:05     ` [gentoo-dev] " Mike Owen
2005-11-23 20:13       ` Dan Meltzer
2005-11-23 21:16         ` Mike Owen
2005-11-23 21:21           ` Dan Meltzer
2005-11-23 21:31     ` Bruno
2005-11-22 14:53 ` Stephen P. Becker
2005-11-22 15:15   ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-22 16:19     ` [gentoo-dev] " Thomas Kirchner
2005-11-22 16:39       ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-22 17:12         ` Harald van Dijk
2005-11-22 17:51           ` Simon Stelling
2005-11-22 17:59             ` Re[2]: " Jakub Moc
2005-11-22 18:08               ` Joe McCann
2005-11-22 17:40         ` Abhay Kedia
2005-11-22 18:02           ` Stephen P. Becker
2005-11-22 18:48             ` Abhay Kedia
2005-11-22 18:59           ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-22 19:23             ` Abhay Kedia
2005-11-22 18:13       ` Danny van Dyk
2005-11-22 18:20         ` Re[2]: " Jakub Moc
2005-11-22 18:47           ` Danny van Dyk
2005-11-23 17:30             ` Sven Vermeulen
2005-11-22 18:03     ` [gentoo-dev] " Grant Goodyear
2005-11-22 18:16       ` Re[2]: " Jakub Moc
2005-11-22 18:17       ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-11-22 19:04         ` Grant Goodyear
2005-11-22 19:47           ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-22 18:29       ` Daniel Ostrow
2005-11-24 20:49         ` [gentoo-dev] [OT] " lnxg33k
2005-11-25 14:28           ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-12-02  5:21             ` lnxg33k
2005-11-22 19:06       ` [gentoo-dev] " Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-22 19:28         ` Grant Goodyear
2005-11-22 19:57           ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-22 20:16             ` Re[2]: " Jakub Moc
2005-11-22 20:28               ` Alexey Chumakov
2005-11-22 21:02                 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-22 20:42               ` Alec Joseph Warner [this message]
2005-11-22 21:13                 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-22 20:58               ` Re[2]: " Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-22 21:36                 ` Re[4]: " Jakub Moc
2005-11-22 23:26                   ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-23  0:55                     ` Re[6]: " Jakub Moc
2005-11-23  1:09                       ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-11-23  1:13                       ` Mark Loeser
2005-11-23  1:30                       ` Re[6]: " George Prowse
2005-11-23 10:25                       ` Paul de Vrieze
2005-11-23 11:06                         ` Re[8]: " Jakub Moc
2005-11-23 13:01                           ` Ned Ludd
2005-11-23 13:19                             ` Ned Ludd
2005-11-23 15:57                               ` Henrik Brix Andersen
2005-11-23 14:16                                 ` solar
2005-11-23 13:50                           ` Paul de Vrieze
2005-11-22 15:10 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-22 15:26   ` Henrik Brix Andersen
2005-11-22 15:49     ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-22 15:54   ` Lance Albertson
2005-11-22 16:06     ` Andrew Gaffney
2005-11-22 16:18       ` Lance Albertson
2005-11-22 16:30     ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-22 17:15       ` Lance Albertson
2005-11-22 18:37         ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-22 17:24       ` Re[2]: " Jakub Moc
2005-11-22 16:56 ` Benjamin Judas
2005-11-22 20:54   ` Henrik Brix Andersen
2005-11-22 18:06 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-11-23  4:01 ` Andrew Muraco
2005-11-23  9:24   ` Paul de Vrieze
2005-11-23 14:12     ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-11-24  5:26     ` Sven Vermeulen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=438382BD.70904@egr.msu.edu \
    --to=warnera6@egr.msu.edu \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox