From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Eecfp-0003at-2E for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 18:15:21 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAMIE5Tw002379; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 18:14:05 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAMI7hle003620 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 18:07:43 GMT Received: from p83.129.50.65.tisdip.tiscali.de ([83.129.50.65] helo=[192.168.101.99]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1EecYP-0002uX-Ea for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 18:07:41 +0000 Message-ID: <43835FD0.7020209@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 19:13:36 +0100 From: Danny van Dyk User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051119) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Decision to remove stage1/2 from installation documentation References: <20051122144745.GR12982@mail.lieber.org> <438330E1.2000804@gentoo.org> <1132672527.27288.21.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20051122161955.GA15198@halffull.org> In-Reply-To: <20051122161955.GA15198@halffull.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: ab8eec12-3c37-4e31-afb0-1d9a5ffc3f56 X-Archives-Hash: 3c50b27845912601e2c964c351510212 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Thomas Kirchner schrieb: | I'm against this change, personally. Stage1 has *always* been for | advanced users. If someone screws up their own system (which is possible | in any number of other ways, as well) then it's their fault. Gentoo | isn't about babying users. It is about choice. And if changing that is | the only way to reduce your workload, well... In which way do we take away your ability to choose by moving documentation from one place to another one? It's just the aim to not include this documentation into the handbook (which ends up on the installcds) and to move it out of the scope of ricers. Advanced won't need that documentation anyway, as they don't qualify as adcaneced if they do! (At least in my eyes) Danny - -- Danny van Dyk Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDg1/QaVNL8NrtU6IRApExAKCnhZf9k+PjJOpWTYlO+C4Np+csigCeO3tC Eh8xRxPL3AHyqRylAtTjvuc= =/oto -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list