From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EeB7J-0006bI-HY for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 12:49:53 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jALCn8Ci001665; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 12:49:08 GMT Received: from gw01.mail.saunalahti.fi (gw01.mail.saunalahti.fi [195.197.172.115]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jALClAEB027997 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 12:47:10 GMT Received: from [192.168.150.87] (YYYMMMCCII.dsl.saunalahti.fi [85.76.10.103]) by gw01.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70950100C26 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:47:09 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <4381C1CA.7020408@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:47:06 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051028) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: aging ebuilds with unstable keywords References: <20051114071225.57DE92D8249@caddie.localnet> <4381336F.9010007@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4381336F.9010007@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 OpenPGP: url=http://users.tkk.fi/~praty/public.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigB547D887E2BEB365C7FB0954" X-Archives-Salt: 682c4485-0bda-4472-bb72-610209200486 X-Archives-Hash: 0095aecbf619691f0446bffc6b39b946 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigB547D887E2BEB365C7FB0954 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit R Hill wrote: > Daniel Ahlberg wrote: > > >>* if ebuild installs COPYING and/or INSTALL into doc. > > > Is this actually important? There are a hell of a lot of ebuilds that fail > under this rule. I'd like to start filing patches for some of the packages in > this list so I'm interested in knowing what's worth fixing and what's being > pedantic. > Not a blocker but just useless. Filing patches for ebuilds doing this is greatly appreciated by at least me. Regards, Petteri --------------enigB547D887E2BEB365C7FB0954 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDgcHNcxLzpIGCsLQRAr9vAJ93/u5a7f3o812qVilAD64J9O7gNACgldLh AeaZJiDhhn1OpP9S9mELpyE= =awxJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigB547D887E2BEB365C7FB0954-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list