From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ee6H1-00046p-Kl for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 07:39:36 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAL7cqFf010437; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 07:38:52 GMT Received: from centrmmtao02.cox.net (centrmmtao02.cox.net [70.168.83.82]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAL7b5W0028182 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 07:37:05 GMT Received: from [10.3.1.3] (really [68.102.201.166]) by centrmmtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20051121073658.RBAZ8484.centrmmtao02.cox.net@[10.3.1.3]> for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 02:36:58 -0500 Message-ID: <4381791C.8030005@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 01:37:00 -0600 From: Lance Albertson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051026) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org References: <438174BD.9060100@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <438174BD.9060100@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig9B5DCCC6988DD3757E31DDDB" X-Archives-Salt: 3e4b3812-5546-41fc-8c9d-001ef7ee8594 X-Archives-Hash: 32feb0ca3e872873040d7c9a01c5e043 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig9B5DCCC6988DD3757E31DDDB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Curtis Napier wrote: > If you have access to a Macintosh, Windows, *BSD or any other OS or > Browser please test the site and include your OS and the browser version > in your feedback. I haven't received feedback from Konqueror or Safari > so feedback from those browsers would be much appreciated. Visually, the light grey color for the main text makes it a bit harder to read the instructions. Any reason why you couldn't use black or a darker color for the text? To me that text is the most important part of our site and if we can't read that well, we have a problem :-). That was the most glaring thing I could see first off. I'll have to dig through the site more later. Cheers- -- Lance Albertson Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager --- GPG Public Key: Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net --------------enig9B5DCCC6988DD3757E31DDDB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDgXkfQW+hXSf0t0IRAl2bAJ4miboSbDsr6vqhXa6IVI/gqTOVHwCfRPul 6ClEN87DYq3bxHekRDFfJ3Y= =lkVV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig9B5DCCC6988DD3757E31DDDB-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list