From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Edxyn-0006OW-C7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 22:48:13 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAKMlTRX022838; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 22:47:29 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAKMjgWH025414 for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 22:45:42 GMT Received: from c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net ([67.171.150.177] helo=[192.168.1.106]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1EdxwL-0002e9-QR for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 22:45:41 +0000 Message-ID: <4380FC95.4030003@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 14:45:41 -0800 From: Donnie Berkholz User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051031) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Distcc and SLP - request for testing References: <1132507911.17028.27.camel@localhost> <4380D0A0.1090302@gentoo.org> <1132516791.17028.29.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1132516791.17028.29.camel@localhost> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 1771694e-4b3c-405a-85f9-11273cf64ca5 X-Archives-Hash: 4497bb36d39f8bd10c4e28bcbb5e06cb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Lisa Seelye wrote: | On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 11:38 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |>Out of curiosity, why isn't this patch just being sent upstream for |>incorporation there? | | | It is, but there hasn't been much work on Distcc this year. Our policy for X is that if upstream won't accept it, we won't either. Perhaps you'd be interested in adopting that and convincing the reported to get upstream interested? Thanks, Donnie -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDgPyVXVaO67S1rtsRAjksAJ4x0liIbHCV0Qej5oHsNHIlfFoWuwCgtHtU qMneOCpCbBsblthSnbCxtj4= =Oj3W -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list