From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EdhF5-0005BF-MA for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 04:55:56 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAK4sY7m020217; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 04:54:34 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAK4osKW000982 for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 04:50:54 GMT Received: from adsl-208-191-38-117.dsl.tpkaks.swbell.net ([208.191.38.117] helo=[10.0.0.159]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1EdhAE-00004K-Gc for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 04:50:54 +0000 Message-ID: <438000AD.404@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 22:50:53 -0600 From: Lance Albertson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Macintosh/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] implementation details for GLEP 41 References: <20051119170615.GW12982@mail.lieber.org> <20051119224241.GC12982@mail.lieber.org> <20051120042549.GJ12958@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <200511192042.38836.cshields@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200511192042.38836.cshields@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig8501F7829DE491994C85AE29" X-Archives-Salt: bd91b901-11a1-4fb4-a797-7e6d0feb17b1 X-Archives-Hash: 2b3095e85d63979c7cfa15541b8e84f2 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig8501F7829DE491994C85AE29 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Corey Shields wrote: > On Saturday 19 November 2005 08:25 pm, Grant Goodyear wrote: > >>In any event, do we need a new server anyway? We actually do have some >>money that could be spent on such things, and the CVS server is really >>high on the list of for which I, personally, would be more than willing >>to spend it. >> >>-g2boojum- > > > This is a good possibility.. I personally don't use cvs that much but have > heard from quite a few people that it could be faster. And the box that it > is currently on does not have any OOB management. > > We've talked about OSL getting a couple of new boxes for Gentoo, one for a new > dev.gentoo.org and one for cvs, but it's looking like just the one for dev > will be a reality. I will be ordering it next week. That said, we can roll > in an order for an additional box and get a good price on it. > > The problem in all of this is the money transfer. I'll check on Monday if > there is a possible way to go from Gentoo Paypal to OSL Foundation. We can > whip out a proposal if that works out. (there are other ways of doing it, > yes, but this would be cheapest I know of right now) Yeah, we defiantly could use a beefy new server for CVS/SVN. Just make sure you chat with robbat2/Pylon on the specifics for the requirements. I believe the main thing they wanted was lots of ram. -- Lance Albertson Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager --- GPG Public Key: Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net --------------enig8501F7829DE491994C85AE29 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD4DBQFDgACtQW+hXSf0t0IRAt8kAKCPgV+dZ04S+SCwRLZCqCXcIs7yLgCYhW0U +QqBKhahgHCq3ViFAjOtQA== =O0hw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig8501F7829DE491994C85AE29-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list