From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Edde0-0002Lj-QB for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 01:05:25 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAK14hcs013247; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 01:04:43 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAK12sGX011973 for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 01:02:54 GMT Received: from adsl-208-191-38-117.dsl.tpkaks.swbell.net ([208.191.38.117] helo=[10.0.0.159]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1EddbZ-0008Jt-Ow for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 01:02:53 +0000 Message-ID: <437FCB3B.5080204@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 19:02:51 -0600 From: Lance Albertson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Macintosh/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] implementation details for GLEP 41 References: <20051119170615.GW12982@mail.lieber.org> <20051119224241.GC12982@mail.lieber.org> <46059ce10511191444u26638588qbba94f158c19327e@mail.gmail.com> <20051119225650.GE12982@mail.lieber.org> <1132443878.6892.57.camel@localhost> <437FBFB8.8070207@gentoo.org> <1132446526.6892.63.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1132446526.6892.63.camel@localhost> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig36FF6591FF0B044D9E33EF7A" X-Archives-Salt: 463dabe5-7862-4219-b25c-0cdbddc337ce X-Archives-Hash: 50899d171a1a1c8339e09305ac5633c7 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig36FF6591FF0B044D9E33EF7A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lares Moreau wrote: > On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 18:13 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote: > >>is the 25-55 minute lag good enough? > It may need to be good enough. Personally I would like to have < 5-7 > min. That way when I'm working with a dev, I can keep up to speed with > her/him without having to resort to an overlay and emailing > ebuilds.tar's. A dedicated 'AT/HT' sync box sounds like an acceptable > solution. For now, I don't want to rsync more than every 30 minutes (concerns of overloading the main cvs server). Pylon has mentioned that the newer version of cvs has better commit hooks that may allow for more of a live replication effect, but I don't expect that to happen any time soon. I will try and come up with a revised version of GLEP 41 and see if hparker and folks will agree with this new solution. We will probably still have the blocking script on this server, but will be at a much higher level. This is just to prevent folks from abusing the service or giving out their access for other people to use. I really don't see that happening, but I would prefer to have some kind of prevention in place for infra's sake. I'll have to think out details on the authentication scheme for access, but I would assume it would be per AT and not a shared access account. Thoughts? -- Lance Albertson Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager --- GPG Public Key: Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net --------------enig36FF6591FF0B044D9E33EF7A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDf8s9QW+hXSf0t0IRAnazAKDxDjRwshLxAlNR55yr4mXYZWBF7ACfSUXL f40uvAvIKtTthXAP6eYmnqw= =Y/y2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig36FF6591FF0B044D9E33EF7A-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list