From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EdQWZ-0003iK-H3 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 11:04:51 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAJB3b1K021794; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 11:03:37 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAJB0ajk011930 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 11:00:40 GMT Received: from car75-2-82-66-60-148.fbx.proxad.net ([82.66.60.148]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1EdQSS-0000Ob-8z for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 11:00:36 +0000 Message-ID: <437F05CF.7080900@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 12:00:31 +0100 From: Thierry Carrez Organization: Gentoo Linux User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050727) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain References: <1132333748.8524.9.camel@localhost> <20051119003803.GD12958@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <1044169158.20051119031533@gentoo.org> <200511191334.10158.cshields@gentoo.org> <437EF0EB.3030109@gentoo.org> <20051119094608.0275f015@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20051119094608.0275f015@snowdrop.home> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: ab1b0514-0d95-4a00-973f-6c2fa3e7b487 X-Archives-Hash: 7900bc09bb8b4969aa2c96d9238c6fac Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > What discussion? As both myself and Grant pointed out on this list > before the meeting, there wasn't any. Yet the council decided to go > ahead and approve the thing anyway... Discussion and intermediary decision. The intermediary decision (during the October meeting, one month ago) was that the GLEP would be approved, pending a list of changes. During last month, nobody raised his voice to say this list of changes was fundamentally flawed. Which in the gentoo-dev world, is quite outstanding. Then those changes were added, no more, no less, so the GLEP was approved. It's not as if the new version was a rewrite from scratch. It's just implementation of required changes that nobody complained about for a whole month... -- Koon -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list