From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EdHL7-0002TW-TL for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 01:16:26 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAJ1FgbD030838; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 01:15:43 GMT Received: from rs25s12.datacenter.cha.cantv.net (200-44-33-102.genericrev.cantv.net [200.44.33.102] (may be forged)) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAJ1DuxF028351 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 01:13:56 GMT Received: from dC9D12581.dslam-01-3-15-01-1-01.smg.dsl.cantv.net (dC9D12581.dslam-01-3-15-01-1-01.smg.dsl.cantv.net [201.209.37.129]) by rs25s12.datacenter.cha.cantv.net (8.13.4/8.13.0/3.0) with ESMTP id jAJ1DsQR022431 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 21:13:55 -0400 X-Matched-Lists: [] Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by dC9D12581.dslam-01-3-15-01-1-01.smg.dsl.cantv.net with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EdHId-0007hC-Ft for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 21:13:51 -0400 Message-ID: <437E7C4F.8050602@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 21:13:51 -0400 From: "Luis F. Araujo" Organization: Gentoo inc. User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051030) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain References: <1132333748.8524.9.camel@localhost> <20051118173243.GA16034@dmz.brixandersen.dk> <437E4F3E.5070705@gentoo.org> <20051118221428.15ba3adb@snowdrop.home> <437E5965.10502@gentoo.org> <20051118235829.GC12958@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <3610591862.20051119010748@gentoo.org> <20051119003803.GD12958@dst.grantgoodyear.org> In-Reply-To: <20051119003803.GD12958@dst.grantgoodyear.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87.1, clamav-milter version 0.87 on rs25s12.datacenter.cha.cantv.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Archives-Salt: d977e45b-669b-4123-acb1-9a1758dcaf41 X-Archives-Hash: 052a6ec4281f0114368c246e91986d20 Grant Goodyear wrote: >Jakub Moc wrote: [Fri Nov 18 2005, 06:07:48PM CST] > > >>19.11.2005, 0:58:29, Grant Goodyear wrote: >> >> >> >>>My preference is that the subdomain chosen should succinctly reflect >>>the role that arch testers serve. My personal preference would be >>>to choose something like "aide", "helper", "assistant", or something >>>similar. (Indeed, I'd have preferred "volunteer" if it weren't for >>>the niggling fact that we're all volunteers.) >>> >>> > > > >>Once again - I don't know if it's not been clear enough so far, from >>the replies on this topic: I don't have time nor desire to dig out >>somewhere on the web what's the correct email I should use to contact >>someone... there are about 200 more or less active Gentoo devs around >>and the last thing I need is to ponder upon what project/role that >>particular person is on. What's the benefit? >> >> > >Perhaps you should re-read the GLEP? Or the log from the last two >Council meetings? Nobody is suggesting that devs should have their >e-mail addresses changed to foo@subdomain.gentoo.org. The issue is what >e-mail address to give people who are helping out Gentoo but not >actually devs. > @g.o >Since these people are not going to be maintaining > > But they are helping out Gentoo in a very direct way right? >packages, it seems unlikely that you're going to have to spend all that >much time trying to figure out how to contact them; just hit "r" like >you would with any other user. > > > It'd be more time than if it was just @g.o , that's for sure. >Incidentally, the benefit is to make users who are actively helping >Gentoo feel like they're part of the family. > That's why i said, give them @g.o > It was decided that a >straight @gentoo.org address would be confusing, though, since most >people associate those addresses with developers. > Let's write a GLEP to clarify that @g.o addresses is for people who cooperates (in a direct way) with Gentoo. > I'm fairly agnostic >on the whole thing, myself, but since the Council voted to approve the >GLEP, I was simply trying to do my best to put forth a proposal that fit >within that framework. > >-g2boojum- > > -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list