From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EdFX4-0001iv-W4 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 23:20:39 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAINJu5S023403; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 23:19:56 GMT Received: from cs.ubishops.ca (CS.ubishops.ca [206.167.194.132]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAINIBVm002076 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 23:18:11 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.52] (toronto-HSE-ppp4136711.sympatico.ca [70.51.49.7]) by cs.ubishops.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 496613A7A1 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 18:18:10 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <437E6134.70104@cs.ubishops.ca> Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 18:18:12 -0500 From: Scott Stoddard User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051107) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain References: <1132333748.8524.9.camel@localhost> <20051118173243.GA16034@dmz.brixandersen.dk> <437E4F3E.5070705@gentoo.org> <20051118221428.15ba3adb@snowdrop.home> <437E5965.10502@gentoo.org> <20051118225514.4fc5cb6b@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20051118225514.4fc5cb6b@snowdrop.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 0fa708d4-60f0-4a34-a86f-a079dc3a426b X-Archives-Hash: 43c3911a0219ee8912c0055f01137a13 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:44:53 -0500 Curtis Napier > wrote: > | Maybe a new GLEP is in order? It makes sense to do it now since infra > | is going to be setting up alias' anyway. While we're at it possibly > | an @dev.g.o as well (as someone mentioned)? That way there is no > | confusion. If anyone wants to pursue this we should start a new > | thread to keep the issues seperate. > > If someone's going to do that, could they consider @herd.g.o as well? > Being relatively new to the team, I speak with a bit of naivet'e about the whole thing, but doesn't that seem to make the most sense? @dev.gentoo.org for devs @herd.gentoo.org for herd ATs @staff.gentoo.org for forum admins, PR people, etc Scott. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list