From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EdF1X-0007ga-C2 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 22:48:03 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAIMlLWM008619; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 22:47:21 GMT Received: from smtp111.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp111.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.210]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAIMj8Ru032045 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 22:45:09 GMT Received: (qmail 39366 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2005 22:45:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.5?) (curtis119@sbcglobal.net@69.214.158.132 with plain) by smtp111.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Nov 2005 22:45:07 -0000 Message-ID: <437E5965.10502@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:44:53 -0500 From: Curtis Napier User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051114) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain References: <1132333748.8524.9.camel@localhost> <20051118173243.GA16034@dmz.brixandersen.dk> <437E4F3E.5070705@gentoo.org> <20051118221428.15ba3adb@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20051118221428.15ba3adb@snowdrop.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 38204369-71b8-4098-adde-ad027f15b379 X-Archives-Hash: a6d34ecc81d0456662f3c07e4b073d46 Homer Parker wrote: > On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 17:01 -0500, Curtis Napier wrote: > >>This sounds good to me as well, very professional. How easy is it >>going >>to be to change to a normal @g.o address? As simple as a forward? For >>instance, if someone who is an AT decides to become a full dev. > > > That's what the GLEP says will happen ;) > :redfaced: Sorry, I read the glep initially when it was first posted but I forgot that detail. Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:01:34 -0500 Curtis Napier > wrote: > | This sounds good to me as well, very professional. > > The problem with staff is that staff who aren't ATs/HTs won't be using > it... > I agree with this. Those of us who don't have commit rights to the tree should have an @staff.g.o, people like me for instance. I happen to be part of two projects but neither gives me access to the tree so I would get an @staff.g.o and am fine with that. It lets people I email outside of the project know that I am staff and not a developer. Maybe a new GLEP is in order? It makes sense to do it now since infra is going to be setting up alias' anyway. While we're at it possibly an @dev.g.o as well (as someone mentioned)? That way there is no confusion. If anyone wants to pursue this we should start a new thread to keep the issues seperate. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list