From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EYahX-0004FE-QB for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 06 Nov 2005 02:56:12 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jA62tOJS030434; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 02:55:24 GMT Received: from ms-smtp-02.tampabay.rr.com (ms-smtp-02-smtplb.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.5.132]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jA62rdOc027022 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2005 02:53:39 GMT Received: from zeus.butsugenjitemple.org (57.85.118.70.cfl.res.rr.com [70.118.85.57]) by ms-smtp-02.tampabay.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id jA62rab6006845 for ; Sat, 5 Nov 2005 21:53:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (zeus [192.168.1.2]) by zeus.butsugenjitemple.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5B59B1 for ; Sat, 5 Nov 2005 21:53:37 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <436D7031.2010604@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 21:53:37 -0500 From: Aaron Walker User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051020) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] useful profiles.desc References: <436CC04C.5060401@gentoo.org> <1131215695.27346.25.camel@vertigo.twi-31o2.org> In-Reply-To: <1131215695.27346.25.camel@vertigo.twi-31o2.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine X-Archives-Salt: 3448b91e-b893-482b-a5f5-0e33ac3bbe35 X-Archives-Hash: 261de1e15da492c67bf5724b7d5262fc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 09:23 -0500, Aaron Walker wrote: > >>Continuing a subject I've brought up several times in the past... >> >>Are we any closer to having a profiles.desc that lists all valid profiles? >>IIRC the current stable portage should be ok with it. Are there any other >>issues preventing this from becoming a reality? > > > There should be no issues anymore. I was planning on doing this myself > at some point. Are you wanting to do this, or should I? Doesn't matter one way or the other to me :) If you were planning on doing it soon then go for it. I probably won't have the time to do it myself until I get done moving in a week or two. I vaguely remember someone (might've even been you) having all archs report a list of valid profiles. That'd be a good starting point. Cheers - -- How many weeks are there in a light year? Aaron Walker [ BSD | commonbox | cron | cvs-utils | mips | netmon | shell-tools | vim ] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDbXAxC3poscuANHARAqhDAJ9P20MkYu+8HlhS59k9BYTtHC+HOACgilSe 25436aidq0JMwoy/vRkJPKA= =bnh4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list