From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ETFLn-0001MX-A1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 09:07:39 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9M94dwR015653; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 09:04:39 GMT Received: from gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi (gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi [195.197.172.116]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j9M9280h008890 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 09:02:08 GMT Received: from [192.168.150.87] (YYYMMMCCII.dsl.saunalahti.fi [85.76.10.103]) by gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3A3AD4090 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 12:05:00 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <435A00E2.3030606@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 12:05:38 +0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051020) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ${PORTDIR}/profiles/package.use References: <43581061.5090102@gentoo.org> <4358BB36.1090902@gentoo.org> <200510210913.29341.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200510210913.29341.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 OpenPGP: url=http://users.tkk.fi/~praty/public.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE17B5FF071C7DFA02D2209DB" X-Archives-Salt: ae972ae1-4783-410a-894f-d3b977bb3d7f X-Archives-Hash: 2586cad240c0d4bb280afb1401af3ef6 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE17B5FF071C7DFA02D2209DB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Friday 21 October 2005 05:56 am, Marius Mauch wrote: >=20 >>Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote: >> >>>Every once in a while I see people wanting to use nosomething use flag= s. >>>Why don't we have a package.use like we already have a package.mask >>>file? This would make it possible for developers to turn on use flags = by >>>default in a way that would not cruft the base profiles for every loca= l >>>use flag. >> >>The main problem I'd have with this is the stacking order, e.g. >>profiles/package.use has "app-misc/foo bar" and make.conf has >>"USE=3D-bar", which one should be preferred? >=20 >=20 > this is a no brainer >=20 > profile use.defaults > profile package.use > profile make.defaults > user make.conf > user package.use > user env > -mike >=20 Ah yes. Why make the profiles behave differently than the user order? In user order we have make.conf before package.use and in profile make.defaults after package.use. Regards, Petteri --------------enigE17B5FF071C7DFA02D2209DB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDWgDicxLzpIGCsLQRAoUgAKCQ4vnIwYkrsujidMKzya56UcGcygCgmMJo ZcrH6YzFuRwyhOPdPmv1Xsw= =BSKj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE17B5FF071C7DFA02D2209DB-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list