From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ESgB4-0000Ct-Gn for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:34:14 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9KJVRqQ026440; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:31:27 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j9KJT548020724 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:29:06 GMT Received: from c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net ([67.171.150.177] helo=[192.168.1.106]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1ESg8b-0002an-IU for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:31:41 +0000 Message-ID: <4357F09E.4060204@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 12:31:42 -0700 From: Donnie Berkholz User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050821) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] modular X - 7.0 RC1 References: <4357432E.2020009@gentoo.org> <200510201754.53322.danarmak@gentoo.org> <4357E549.4000105@gentoo.org> <200510202125.08983.danarmak@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200510202125.08983.danarmak@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 866f2c2f-66a0-4b1e-9fcb-3f6d1411a07c X-Archives-Hash: e5d0d931748212a2dc7dd53ef614eba9 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dan Armak wrote: | On Thursday 20 October 2005 20:43, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |>Or, you could just activate it in the base profile. | | True. I forget - why can't we solve the problem of all nofoo USE flags this | way? Or is the (remaining) problem only with local flags? Some people have issues with adding local flags to profiles. As for the others, I dunno. Maybe they're just too lazy to get their flag in profiles. Thanks, Donnie -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDV/CdXVaO67S1rtsRArZhAKDhNOuRs24Fh5B4kiB3+FC3FYHY2gCg3b4l 9HULcG30xudaDdwsOwV9xJg= =zLAN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list