From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ESfTY-0005QZ-0m for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 18:49:16 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9KIjWbJ030808; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 18:45:32 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j9KIekSw020422 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 18:40:46 GMT Received: from c-67-171-150-177.hsd1.or.comcast.net ([67.171.150.177] helo=[192.168.1.106]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1ESfNp-0005Ah-9Y for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 18:43:21 +0000 Message-ID: <4357E549.4000105@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 11:43:21 -0700 From: Donnie Berkholz User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050821) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] modular X - 7.0 RC1 References: <4357432E.2020009@gentoo.org> <200510201526.47620.danarmak@gentoo.org> <4357B780.3090101@gentoo.org> <200510201754.53322.danarmak@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200510201754.53322.danarmak@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 3b1916ad-277c-457c-8dd3-c0f7b4659a15 X-Archives-Hash: d1d8d7e7ad596dc385a79daac7702940 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dan Armak wrote: | On Thursday 20 October 2005 17:28, Luca Barbato wrote: |>a useflag could solve the issue as well a all inclusive metaebuild for X. | | To solve this issue it would have to be an on-by-default flag, i.e. | 'noxserver'. I know some people are strongly against nofoo flags. Or, you could just activate it in the base profile. | Also, we'd have to include RDEPEND="!noxserver? ( x11-base/xorg-x11 )" in | every ebuild in the tree being updated to depend on x11-base/xorg-libs. Or an | eclass to the same effect. This would be easily forgotten in new ebuilds, and | then we'd get inconsistent behavior. That's a good point. Any ideas on how to deal with it? Thanks, Donnie -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDV+VJXVaO67S1rtsRAoLsAJ0aiEOHDnpTJ/8vM5ImM23qmz1oXwCeLgG4 LVQZG0Vp/BG5IiAw5IlYc7Q= =jMQO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list