From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EScRq-0005Re-LH for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:35:19 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9KFVOJb022451; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:31:24 GMT Received: from smtp7.libero.it (smtp7.libero.it [193.70.192.90]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j9KFQihr004776 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:26:45 GMT Received: from localhost (172.16.1.48) by smtp7.libero.it (7.0.027-DD01) id 431C36B4036F3229 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:29:20 +0200 Received: from smtp2.libero.it ([172.16.1.97]) by localhost (asav8.libero.it [193.70.193.94]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13341-08-8 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:29:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.5] (adsl-ull-70-52.44-151.net24.it [151.44.52.70]) by smtp2.libero.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91A6BA8CB4 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:29:19 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: <4357B780.3090101@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:28:00 +0200 From: Luca Barbato User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051004) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] modular X - 7.0 RC1 References: <4357432E.2020009@gentoo.org> <200510201526.47620.danarmak@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200510201526.47620.danarmak@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned: with antispam and antivirus automated system at libero.it X-Archives-Salt: 86fcd30a-09ca-47f7-ac26-2c7e65144fe4 X-Archives-Hash: dc0d30b37cb2f2797edf18d541a7f18e Dan Armak wrote: > On Thursday 20 October 2005 09:11, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > To keep the current behaviour, the kde metaebuild (and gnome and the other > WMs) would have to depend on xorg-x11, which strictly speaking is > unnecessary. Opinions? How can we educate the users to manually 'emerge > xorg-x11'? Personally I'm in favor of updating the docs, making a big > announcement on all channels, and preparing a nice bug to close duplicates > against. > > We'll also need to educate them about xorg-x11 not installing fonts any > longer. The way I understood your metabuilds.txt, 'emerge xorg-x11 kde' would > result in an unusable system without any fonts at all... > a useflag could solve the issue as well a all inclusive metaebuild for X. -- Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux Developer Gentoo/PPC Operational Leader http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list