From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EPFo2-00084O-VM for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 08:48:19 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9B8c2SG004807; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 08:38:02 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j9B8aJ91022434 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 08:36:20 GMT Received: from user.scort.com ([213.41.103.70] helo=[10.1.10.18]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1EPFla-00025g-Og for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 08:45:47 +0000 Message-ID: <434B7BB8.6060305@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 10:45:44 +0200 From: Thierry Carrez Organization: Gentoo Linux User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050728) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Council meeting Thursday October 13th References: <434A5FA9.206@gentoo.org> <20051010213636.GB27341@CogES> <20051010224319.56e2408a@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20051010224319.56e2408a@snowdrop.home> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: e3bb8918-e236-4b54-ba1b-8e8b462f0b8d X-Archives-Hash: 2fa7eca5691d44018dc9ccb008be81f0 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 23:36:36 +0200 Marcin Kryczek > wrote: > | someone (sorry - but i can't remind who exactly and i can't find that > | mail) mentiond it'd be nice to have some ~weekly summary of important > | (for developers) decisions made in community. > | i think it's good idea, becouse there's often just to many mails to > | read (well - we can fix some bugs in that time;>) and we can miss > | something we certainly shouldn't:| > | council could decide if it's worth to try and put some herd (GDP?) to > | be responsible for it. There are many ways to fix this. Forcing some group to do it is not a solution. One work in progress (that will be proposed in a GLEP) is to change the current ML system to add a dev announcement list that would let everyone know of current discussions and decisions without requiring to follow endless threads. That may cut the "required reading" sufficiently so that a weekly summary is not necessary. > Isn't the idea that someone writes out a draft GLEP and gets it > discussed on -dev (and repeats said process until everyone is happy > with the GLEP) *before* pushing things to the council? It's certainly the idea. It should be at least put into words and discussed in the community before being voted on. -- Koon -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list