From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RKiyp-0005ds-5o for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 03:56:11 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C3EAA21C045 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 03:56:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from egr.msu.edu (jeeves.egr.msu.edu [35.9.37.127]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j92FtaEA012081 for ; Sun, 2 Oct 2005 15:55:37 GMT Received: from [69.176.143.101] (69-176-143-101.dov.spartan-net.net [69.176.143.101]) (authenticated bits=0) by egr.msu.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j92G3TVR020555 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 2 Oct 2005 12:03:30 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <434004F1.1000404@egr.msu.edu> Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2005 12:04:01 -0400 From: Alec Warner User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050806) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: grub reiser4 References: <623652d50509291110667cfab7@mail.gmail.com> <623652d50510020302t7211c5e2g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <623652d50510020302t7211c5e2g@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 1751f04e-2f1c-479a-861e-607c69ab3799 X-Archives-Hash: 0c9a60b012e25b5d33603d88ac83f53a -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Chris Bainbridge wrote: > On 02/10/05, R Hill wrote: > >>The grub maintainer's stance was that reiser 4 support would not be >>included in grub until it was included in gentoo-sources, not any kernel >>in portage. The grub maintainer has been AWOL for the last 9 months or >>so however, so i guess it's now up to the base-system herd. I was under >>the impression that feature-adding patches should be sent upstream. >> >>I still think it's retarded to have a reiser 4 boot partition, but >>whatever stirs your pot. ;P > > > It makes sense if you're actually using reiser4 for everything else. > Why bloat your kernel with an extra FS just for /boot? > Because most people want a tried and true fs on /boot, because if that tanks your system doesn't boot. I'm not trying to bash reiser here, I still use ext2 on /boot even if xfs is my main fs of choice for this reason. Alec Warner (antarus) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQIVAwUBQ0AE8WzglR5RwbyYAQK8qg//ZkvUesz1inYyajZmR5f0AaghEa77cT+m bzZquMF9ttZj81lyqY9dgMvMVCa6+xVU+ZYx7Z76sbDeNeAmn5gQ3vW4KksHulVB pv7SH49hgzKA/ThTjSZsDeVbSVfnAjnElC17keXOp3i7AzPN2QoefqsaheW+L9mg f9Pb63Lz73e49Ahj9YmERJ37HZY28xPIWorlqlL+XkpOhymcofgU9o5iC6qrz+vi ht9cs7E4zNjU1JdNQ8ydsfz6z6Qd/YAu3M+zsd8ENOzO/0iIHFTI3l6Xss3ZfH0b bH4OdLni6qch/dWzoz2WqUo+JQgRYvwnDbE0wtr5kVSkhkmwRG9JFTY5zxzqtbTd MP/QGdx+j79muwVtI4Dl6h4GjnZtRlVmgSjFnNxMwFarITIoqJEtoFgP+mPXxEhe pPC9UwpphOujwMf8K9A6+a54KmGgH+SKKCcDMkiAFNje3HdvKcZTaDeXMzLODMBa iAyfewvzUIZG59AH0uN00sfwQ0lWiISA5p8ILVuoHFsajobv+nvUiWDBq2xZr0NU geHBJ6LsUjHbBSGFiMpWnP49uZCHv2PCbBxhHGIGY007fC1lVoiidah51iLZ3rid 3aU+KCuuXDj3IX4n2uG2HRJZHp8sRLUaCdOWR6oH4+EkRIcF5eCuYTSqN6H1Edrv v1YbLXiDjS4= =DXSo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list